Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: I recommend two group of winners for next year !

Author: steven blincoe

Date: 10:39:47 07/14/04

Go up one level in this thread



>
>Maybe you shouldn't base your sayings on a site who isn't interested in
>promoting computer chess but making money. What do you think any commercial on
>TV or advertisement does? Ever heard of small print? You think they are going to
>go into the details of the tournament? A title is a title. Is it really that
>difficult to grasp?

actually its exactly what i expected
and it illustrates the point quite nicely,i think,that except perhaps for some
members here,the rest of the world considers the WCCC to be the premiere test of
program strength..hardware...geee..whats that?
we here are not indicitive of the rest of the world..

as long as this is the perception..then lets do it right in the future
lets put everyone on an even playing field..then at least the claims can be made
that the  best program won  and it will really mean something

Steve






>
>>
>>as long as the perception of this event remains that the best program is the
>>winner...its then best to have the same hardware in the future
>>Steve
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>my hat is off to you and Omni
>>>you took on the big boys with the mega bucks  and their multi-million dollar
>>>computers..you had courage..you fought the good fight!
>>>Shalom(peace) to you both
>>>Steve
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> because programs that could use better hardware like
>>>>Deep Sjeng or ParSos used only a single processor not because of programming
>>>>advantage and programs that used a single processor did not use the best one not
>>>>because of programming.
>>>>
>>>>Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.