Author: Omid David Tabibi
Date: 11:40:17 07/14/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 14, 2004 at 14:17:33, Matthew Hull wrote: >On July 14, 2004 at 13:00:15, Omid David Tabibi wrote: > >> >>>The goal is the best computer chess. You can't have that unless it's open >>>hardware. It has always been open hardware, >> >>You forget WMCCC. > > >No I don't. This is not WMCCC. It's WCCC. The best chess will be played on >big hardware. That's why it's open hardware. > >If you want to argue for inferior chess, then go organize thw World Inferior >Computer Chess Championship. > >Meanwhile, the rest of us want to see the best computer chess the world has to >offer. We want to see the envelope pushed as far as it can go. > > >The best computer chess in the world is supposed to be seen at the World >Championship. You can't do that by limiting hardware. > >I don't know how many different ways it needs to be said. Your idea is fine >for some other event that is not the WCCC. I did not suggest to abolish the open hardware format to begin with. What I suggest is to hold two events, WCCC for open hardware, and WMCCC for uniform hardware. Just the way it used to be. In WCCC you will find the best engine+hardware combination, and in WMCCC you will find the strongest chess program. > >> >> >> >>>and that's what we all want to >>>see. We demand the best computer chess that can possibly be played. That's >>>what we want. If you can't wrap your mind around that, then find another >>>hobby. >>>
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.