Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: I recommend two group of winners for next year !

Author: Sean Empey

Date: 11:59:44 07/14/04

Go up one level in this thread


On July 14, 2004 at 14:53:26, Uri Blass wrote:

>On July 14, 2004 at 13:52:51, Sean Empey wrote:
>
>>On July 14, 2004 at 13:39:47, steven blincoe wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Maybe you shouldn't base your sayings on a site who isn't interested in
>>>>promoting computer chess but making money. What do you think any commercial on
>>>>TV or advertisement does? Ever heard of small print? You think they are going to
>>>>go into the details of the tournament? A title is a title. Is it really that
>>>>difficult to grasp?
>>>
>>>actually its exactly what i expected
>>>and it illustrates the point quite nicely,i think,that except perhaps for some
>>>members here,the rest of the world considers the WCCC to be the premiere test of
>>>program strength..hardware...geee..whats that?
>>>we here are not indicitive of the rest of the world..
>>
>>You act like the WCCC is this _huge_ public event that the world tunes into. I
>>bet 99% of those who know of it and follow it are members here or at least know
>>it's open hardware.
>
>I think that this estimate is wrong.
>A lot of the people who hear about it even do not know that hardware is
>important in computer chess.
>
>This is a public event and a lot of non programmers hear about it and do not
>expect them to know that hardware is important even if they hear that it is open
>hardware event(and not everybody heard that it is open hardware event).
>
>I remember that I talk with a person who supported the decision not to allow
>changes in software in the israeli league(in the year that computers were
>allowed to play) and he was surprised to hear that a change in the hardware is
>not less importance for playing strength of the programs.
>
>He thought that almost all the progress in computer chess is because of better
>software and that better hardware is relatively unimportant.
>
>A lot of chess players know that Fritz beated Deep Blue in 1995(it was deep blue
>prototype) and the conclusion of part of them is that hardware is probably not
>very important.
>
>Uri


Ok. Thanks for the clarification. I don't know the exact number but feel more
"techies" follow it, who should know. My main point is that it's not as big as a
FIDE championship or other non chess championship event. It's for the most part
unknown about. Even the Rock-Paper-Scissor world champion made it as a guest on
the Conan O'Brien show.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.