Author: José Carlos
Date: 12:09:07 07/14/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 14, 2004 at 14:40:17, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >On July 14, 2004 at 14:17:33, Matthew Hull wrote: > >>On July 14, 2004 at 13:00:15, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >> >>> >>>>The goal is the best computer chess. You can't have that unless it's open >>>>hardware. It has always been open hardware, >>> >>>You forget WMCCC. >> >> >>No I don't. This is not WMCCC. It's WCCC. The best chess will be played on >>big hardware. That's why it's open hardware. >> >>If you want to argue for inferior chess, then go organize thw World Inferior >>Computer Chess Championship. >> >>Meanwhile, the rest of us want to see the best computer chess the world has to >>offer. We want to see the envelope pushed as far as it can go. >> >> >>The best computer chess in the world is supposed to be seen at the World >>Championship. You can't do that by limiting hardware. >> >>I don't know how many different ways it needs to be said. Your idea is fine >>for some other event that is not the WCCC. > >I did not suggest to abolish the open hardware format to begin with. What I >suggest is to hold two events, WCCC for open hardware, and WMCCC for uniform >hardware. Just the way it used to be. In WCCC you will find the best >engine+hardware combination, and in WMCCC you will find the strongest chess >program. No you won't. You'd need at least 100x the games that are played in those tournaments, and the participation of the best programs, to find the strongest anything. You keep making the same mistake all along the thread. José C. >> >>> >>> >>> >>>>and that's what we all want to >>>>see. We demand the best computer chess that can possibly be played. That's >>>>what we want. If you can't wrap your mind around that, then find another >>>>hobby. >>>>
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.