Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: How about open weaponry boxing championship?

Author: Russell Reagan

Date: 14:16:07 07/14/04

Go up one level in this thread

On July 14, 2004 at 14:40:17, Omid David Tabibi wrote:

>I did not suggest to abolish the open hardware format to begin with. What I
>suggest is to hold two events, WCCC for open hardware, and WMCCC for uniform
>hardware. Just the way it used to be. In WCCC you will find the best
>engine+hardware combination, and in WMCCC you will find the strongest chess
>program.

What about the future when the definition of a microprocessor will become fuzzy?
We may not even be able to buy a current CPU with a single core. My
"microprocessor" may have two cores, while the next guy's "microprocessor" has
eight.

• Re: How about open weaponry boxing championship? Omid David Tabibi 14:32:02 07/14/04
  • Re: How about open weaponry boxing championship? Ed Schröder 23:42:07 07/14/04
    • Re: How about open weaponry boxing championship? Omid David Tabibi 14:35:12 07/15/04
      • Re: How about open weaponry boxing championship? Russell Reagan 23:20:04 07/15/04
      • Re: How about open weaponry boxing championship? Matthew Hull 14:52:33 07/15/04
  • Re: How about open weaponry boxing championship? Robert Hyatt 19:07:03 07/14/04

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.