Author: Mike Byrne
Date: 14:17:46 07/14/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 14, 2004 at 16:06:41, Bouddha wrote: >On July 14, 2004 at 13:12:56, Mike Byrne wrote: > >>On July 14, 2004 at 05:36:25, Bigler David wrote: >> >>>Hello all ! >>> >>>What can we expect from this CPU in term of power for chess ? >>> >>>In the past for the iPAQ 1940 there was a Samsung S3C 2410 processor at 266 MHz >>>but I dont know what was the performance with this device and PF2 ? >>> >>>Maybe we can do 400/266 = 1.5 so that means that the new Samsung will be around >>>30 ELO point stronger than the "old" iPAQ 1940 ?? >>> >>>regards >> >>IMO, PF2 (Shredder engine) is stronger than 2500 SSDF running at 400 Mhz on a >>Dell Axim and is most likly in 2500 and 2600 range ( I favor the 2500 - 2550 >>range). Others may disagree. > >I think that your are a bit optimistic. >PF2 on my X5 400 MHz is I think between 2450 and 2500 ELO. >But what on a Samsung 400 MHz ?? > >By the way, maybe that Palm Hiarcs 9.41 on a T3 400 MHz is stronger than PF2 > >rgds I am pretty confident it is over 2500 - but I also agree it is debatable and 2450 to 2500 is not that far from 2500-2550. I have heard others say Hiarcs has done well against PF2. One I don't believe PF2 is optimized for xscale like the Genius program is. Secondly, the games I have seen Hiarcs vs PF2 are Game/10 minutes -- I would like to see some longer games. Most importantly, I would like to see Hiarcs for the PPC ( can you hear me Mark?) ;>). BTW, I believe somebody (maybe Eric Hollingsworth or Mark Uniacke(sp?) believes Hiarcs plays around 2580 on the fast 400 mhz T3 Palm - I believe that is possible, but if true, than the 2450 to 2500 for PF2 is a little light IMO.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.