Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:23:34 07/14/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 14, 2004 at 17:15:39, Uri Blass wrote: >On July 14, 2004 at 16:35:30, Will Singleton wrote: > >>On July 14, 2004 at 05:11:07, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>I posted yesterday some test positions and it seems that people missed them >>> >>>see http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?376470 >>> >>>Uri >> >>It looks to me like all positions have problems with one exception. So the test >>doesn't look that useful. Or maybe I'm wrong (see comments). >> >>r4bk1/1b4p1/p3p3/q3n1B1/Np1NnQ2/1P3p1R/P1P5/2KR4 w - - bm Nxe6; " too hard "; > >Falcon found it during the game so it is not too hard > >Movei needs to improve to find it faster and cannot find it in a reasonable >time: > >Analysis by movei on A3000(that A3000 crashed in bar-ilan again and again but >work for more than 48 hours without a single crash here) > >Analysis so far by movei: > >depth=12 -0.83 f4h2 e5f7 g5e3 f8d6 h2g1 a5e5 c1b1 e4g5 h3h5 d6e7 c2c4 a8f8 >Nodes: 180228316 NPS: 576767 >Time: 00:05:12.48 > >depth=13 -0.70 f4h2 e5f7 g5f4 e4c3 f4c7 a5g5 c7f4 g5e7 a4c3 b4c3 c1b1 e6e5 d4f5 >e7a3 >Nodes: 244101559 NPS: 570997 >Time: 00:07:07.50 >depth=13 -0.70 f4h2 e5f7 g5f4 e4c3 f4c7 a5g5 c7f4 g5e7 a4c3 b4c3 c1b1 e6e5 d4f5 >e7a3 >Nodes: 324662522 NPS: 578545 >Time: 00:09:21.17 >depth=14 -0.97 f4h2 e5f7 g5f4 e4c3 d1h1 f3f2 h3f3 b7e4 h2f2 c3a4 b3a4 f8c5 f2e2 >e4f3 e2f3 >Nodes: 422498103 NPS: 575101 >Time: 00:12:14.65 Movei finally failed high again and again depth=14 -0.96 d4e6 Nodes: 915927496 NPS: 575125 Time: 00:26:32.57 depth=14 -0.67 d4e6 Nodes: 1008095842 NPS: 574426 Time: 00:29:14.96 If weak movei can fail high on it on a fast hardware in less than 30 minutes then I do not consider the position as too easy > > >>r4bkR/1b4p1/p3N1n1/q5B1/Np2nQ2/1P3p2/P1P5/2KR4 b - - bm Nxh8; " too hard "; > >Shredder found it during the game and I checked that movei could find it in few >minutes so it is not too hard. > >>r4bk1/1b1R2p1/p3NBn1/q7/Np1Q4/1P3p2/P1P5/2K5 b - - bm Qf5; " too easy "; > >I checked that it is not too easy for movei and first it prefered a different >move. > >I consider too easy only positions that movei can solve in less than 2 seconds >on fast hardware and it was not one of them. > >>2r3k1/p4rpp/4bp2/4p3/QR2P3/P2qB1P1/5P1P/5RK1 b - - bm a5; " after a5 Rb6, what >>then? "; > >Bd7 and black wins a pawn. > >>2r3k1/1Q1b1rpp/5p2/4p3/8/P3BqP1/5P1P/1R3RK1 b - - bm e4; " too easy "; > >Again latest movei needs 5 seconds to fail high on fast hardware. >I hope to do it too easy for movei in the future. > >>2r4k/r5q1/3Pp3/1R4p1/1Pp1Q2p/7P/4B1PK/8 b - - am c3; " too easy "; > >Cannot be too easy because movei did that mistake in WCCC >Another ply was enough to avoid it. I can add that based on looking at Dann Corbit post Crafty could not solve it and liked c3 after 2 minutes. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.