Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Maybe a test position - Crafty-Shredder

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 15:05:56 07/15/04

Go up one level in this thread


On July 15, 2004 at 15:51:34, Ingo Bauer wrote:

>On July 15, 2004 at 15:33:10, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On July 15, 2004 at 15:13:18, Ingo Bauer wrote:
>>
>>>Hello
>>>
>>>Just 4 those who are interested. In a long game between Crafty and Shredder the
>>>following position occurs:
>>>
>>>[D]8/8/p4k2/1p5p/1PpK2P1/P6P/8/8 w - -
>>>
>>>For some strange reason Crafty decided to play gxh5 at move 58 which is a
>>>loosing move. As far as I know this was considered a bug and is removed in the
>>>latest Crafty release.
>>>
>>>and here is the whole game (Eval/time/expected move by S8), if I can remember it
>>>correctly the time control was 60 move is 105min and 25 min for the remaining
>>>game (WCCC time control minus some operator time)
>>>
>>>[Event "WCCC-preparation"]
>>>[Site "Ingos Home"]
>>>[Date "2004.06.27"]
>>>[Round "1"]
>>>[White "Crafty 19.14 4*Opteron"]
>>>[Black "Shredder8 XP@2500"]
>>>[Result "0-1"]
>>>
>>>1. e4 {0s} e5 {book 0s} 2. Nf3 {9s} Nc6 {book 0s} 3. Bb5
>>>{15s} a6 {book 0s} 4. Bxc6 {8s (Ba4)} dxc6 {book 0s} 5. O-O
>>>{24s} f6 {book 0s} 6. d4 {12s} exd4 {book 0s} 7. Nxd4 {9s}
>>>c5 {book 0s} 8. Nb3 {13s (Ne2)} Qxd1 {book 0s} 9. Rxd1
>>>{10s} Be6 {book 0s} 10. Bf4 {15s (Nc3)} c4 {book 0s}
>>>11. Na5 {9s} b6 {-0.49/19 3:00m} 12. Nc6 {12s} Bd7
>>>{-0.25/20 3:10m} 13. Nd4 {12s} O-O-O {-0.23/20 2:24m}
>>>14. Nd2 {13s} Bg4 {-0.32/20 2:26m} 15. N4f3 {11s (f3)} Bxf3
>>>{-0.07/19 3:17m} 16. Nxf3 {2:43m (gxf3)} Rxd1+ {-0.54/20
>>>3:10m} 17. Rxd1 {58s} Bc5 {-0.42/20 1:16m} 18. Nd4 {1:13m}
>>>Bxd4 {-0.39/22 35s} 19. Rxd4 {14s} b5 {-0.42/23 2:22m}
>>>20. f3 {1:13m} Ne7 {-0.54/22 1:25m} 21. Kf2 {1:10m} Rd8
>>>{-0.46/22 2:03m} 22. Rxd8+ {2:51m (Ke3)} Kxd8 {-0.44/18 4s}
>>>23. Be3 {3:54m (Ke3)} Kd7 {-0.39/21 2:03m} 24. Bc5 {3:13m}
>>>Ng6 {-0.37/23 6s} 25. Bb4 {2:37m (g4)} Nf4 {-0.37/23 2:53m}
>>>26. a3 {2:59m (Bd2)} Ne6 {-0.15/24 2:14m} 27. Ke3 {21s} c5
>>>{-0.15/26 2:20m} 28. Bc3 {21s} Nd8 {-0.22/25 3:22m} 29. b3
>>>{9s (g4)} cxb3 {-0.10/20 32s} 30. cxb3 {24s} Ke7 {-0.27/22
>>>2:08m} 31. g4 {4:41m (f4)} g5 {+0.05/24 2:11m} 32. b4 {58s}
>>>c4 {+0.06/25 1:20m} 33. e5 {1:36m (f4)} fxe5 {0.00/25
>>>2:44m} 34. Bxe5 {50s} Ke6 {0.00/25 1:52m} 35. Ke4 {3:56m}
>>>Nf7 {0.00/26 14s} 36. Bg7 {2:51m (Bg3)} Nd6+ {+0.02/26
>>>3:08m} 37. Kd4 {9s} Ne8 {+0.01/26 2:36m} 38. Bh6 {3:30m}
>>>Kf6 {0.00/28 0s} 39. f4 {3:17m} gxf4 {0.00/27 0s} 40. Bxf4
>>>{3:16m} Ke6 {0.00/27 0s} 41. h3 {4:25m} Nf6 {0.00/28 0s}
>>>42. Bh6 {3:23m (Bd2)} Nd5 {-0.01/27 4:18m} 43. Bd2 {10s
>>>(Bc1)} Ne7 {-0.01/27 4:42m} 44. Bc1 {4:38m (Ke4)} Nd5
>>>{0.00/25 2:50m} 45. Bd2 {3:30m} Nf6 {0.00/27 0s} 46. Bf4
>>>{4:13m (Bc1)} Nd7 {-0.01/26 1:32m} 47. Bg5 {3:49m (Be3)}
>>>Ne5 {0.00/25 30s} 48. Be3 {2:45m} Ng6 {0.00/24 10s} 49. Ke4
>>>{2:01m (Kc5)} Kd6 {0.00/26 3:06m} 50. Bd4 {2:05m (Kd4)} Ke6
>>>{0.00/26 2:44m} 51. Ba1 {22s (Be3)} Kf7 {0.00/27 2:54m}
>>>52. Bb2 {4:04m (Bc3)} Ke6 {0.00/27 3:06m} 53. Bc3 {1:58m}
>>>Ne7 {-0.01/27 1:19m} 54. Bg7 {2:24m (Be1)} Nd5 {+0.01/25
>>>2:17m} 55. Be5 {9s (Bb2)} Nf6+ {+0.03/25 3:10m} 56. Kd4
>>>{3:49m} h5 {+0.02/26 0s} 57. Bxf6 {2:16m (gxh5)} Kxf6
>>>{+0.02/28 2:54m} 58. gxh5 {8:13m (Ke4)} Kg5 {+2.78/28
>>>3:21m} 59. h6 {23s (Ke3)} Kxh6 {+3.77/27 2:15m} 60. Kc3
>>>{10s} Kh5 {+11.15/30 2:52m} 61. Kd4 {1:08m (Kd2)} Kh4
>>>{+12.15/28 1:38m} 62. Ke4 {4:11m} Kxh3 {+M150/28 0s}
>>>63. Kf3 {1:11m} Kh4 {+M150/29 0s} 64. Kf4 {5:03m} Kh5
>>>{+M150/28 0s} 65. Kf3 {26s (Ke3)} Kg5 {+M150/27 7:16m}
>>>66. Ke4 {12s (Ke3)} 0-1
>>>
>>>Bye Ingo
>>>
>>>PS: ...and NO #150 is NOT a bug! :-)
>>
>>
>>This was a bug that was fixed prior to the WCCC.  Here is quick output from the
>>machine used there:
>>
>>               11     0.10  -0.04   1. Ke4 Kg5 2. Kf3 Kg6 3. Ke3 hxg4 4.
>>                                    hxg4 Kg5 5. Kf3 Kf6 6. Ke4 <HT>
>>               11->   0.11  -0.04   1. Ke4 Kg5 2. Kf3 Kg6 3. Ke3 hxg4 4.
>>                                    hxg4 Kg5 5. Kf3 Kf6 6. Ke4 <HT>
>>               12     0.16  -0.04   1. Ke4 Kg5 2. Kf3 Kg6 3. Ke3 hxg4 4.
>>                                    hxg4 Kg5 5. Kf3 Kf6 6. Ke4 <HT>
>>               12->   0.18  -0.04   1. Ke4 Kg5 2. Kf3 Kg6 3. Ke3 hxg4 4.
>>                                    hxg4 Kg5 5. Kf3 Kf6 6. Ke4 <HT>
>>               13     0.25  -0.04   1. Ke4 Kg5 2. Kf3 Kg6 3. Ke3 hxg4 4.
>>                                    hxg4 Kg5 5. Kf3 Kf6 6. Ke4 Kf7 7. a4
>>                                    Ke6
>>               13->   0.29  -0.04   1. Ke4 Kg5 2. Kf3 Kg6 3. Ke3 hxg4 4.
>>                                    hxg4 Kg5 5. Kf3 Kf6 6. Ke4 Kf7 7. a4
>>                                    Ke6
>>               14     0.40  -0.04   1. Ke4 Kg5 2. Kf3 Kg6 3. Ke3 hxg4 4.
>>                                    hxg4 Kg7 5. Kf3 Kf7 6. Ke3 Kf6 7. Ke4
>>                                    Kf7 <HT>
>>               14->   0.48  -0.04   1. Ke4 Kg5 2. Kf3 Kg6 3. Ke3 hxg4 4.
>>                                    hxg4 Kg7 5. Kf3 Kf7 6. Ke3 Kf6 7. Ke4
>>                                    Kf7 <HT> (s=2)
>>               15     0.63  -0.05   1. Ke4 Kg5 2. Kf3 Kg6 3. Ke3 hxg4 4.
>>                                    hxg4 Kg7 5. Kd4 Kf6 6. Ke4 Kf7 <HT>
>>
>>Plays the correct move now instantly and beyond...
>
>
>Thx, Peter allready told me. I hope it is ok to publish the game AFTER the WCCC!

Certainly...


>
>Right now I am playing a game against Crafty at ICC (and it seems that YACE is
>loosing :-( ). It is a pity that your Crafty do not send evals to computer
>opponents.

It does if I know which account is playing. IE against "yace" it should kibitz.
Also against others that have asked, like "postmodernist".  Tell me what account
and I'll add you to the ak list...




>
>Nevertheless, thx 4 your engine!
>Ingo



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.