Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The advantage is too obvious with book and without Book (Experiment

Author: Steve Coladonato

Date: 04:08:52 07/16/04

Go up one level in this thread


I tend to agree with you and have posted previously on this subject.  The book
is human not engine.  You will see comments about the recent WCCC match and see
where so and so had an inferior position out of book.

I have suggested in the past that to truly test the engine, the books should be
the same and even suggested a book depth of between 12 and 20 moves (24-40 ply).
 In the past, before Shredder was Chessbase, I felt that Stefan Meyer-Kahlen's
algorithms or heuristics were a bit better than the competition (I haven't
followed Shredder very much since it was acquired).

Today, I believe the improvements in the performance of the engines is mainly
attributed to the hardware not anything the programmers have done.  The AI
engine that Steve Edwards is working on has perked my interest.

Steve



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.