Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 17:01:24 07/16/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 16, 2004 at 19:49:37, Stuart Cracraft wrote: >Hi -- I have spent days on the hashing and >am ready for something else for awhile. >Found 4 or 5 hashing bugs so far. A real >hornet's nest that one... > >18 ASSERT's in overall code are showing that measurables >being measured are all okay and not violating the >ASSERT's. Thank you Bob Floyd, R.I.P., 1st programming class. > >On the other hand, my PV per iteration has gone >to hell in a handbag. Anyone have a "usual suspect" >for the dogmove 2. ... d7d5 below at 4th iteration? >My max positional (mp) sums to typicaly < 1/5 of a pawn >so it's not that. > >When the ASSERT's were violating before the >hash work, the PV's were always relatively clean. > >1. e2e4 0.00 31 21 e2e4 >2. e2e4 0.00 0 87 e2e4 e7e5 >3. e2e4 0.01 17 276 e2e4 e7e5 f1c4 >4. e2e4 0.04 0 1714 e2e4 e7e5 f1c4 d7d5 >5. e2e4 0.12 17 7636 e2e4 e7e5 g1f3 d7d5 e4d5 >6. e2e4 0.43 0 31106 e2e4 e7e5 f1c4 d7d5 e4d5 d8d5 >7. e2e4 1.57 17 121299 e2e4 e7e5 f1c4 d7d5 e4d5 d8d5 c4d5 >8. e2e4 5.64 0 433830 e2e4 e7e5 f1c4 d7d5 e4d5 d8d5 c4d5 b8c6 >e2e4 5.64 0 433830 e2e4 e7e5 f1c4 d7d5 e4d5 d8d5 c4d5 b8c6 >nps=76892 ha=29.00% q=81.0% bc=72% br=3.6% mp=178<>178 >pawnx=0 recapx=0 qcheckx=25250 checkx=0 futilx=0 qfutilx=40132 The pawn move is bad, but it is a lot less suspect than tossing the queen! Perhaps your evaluation is inverted for black? He looks like he's in a hurry to lose.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.