Author: Stuart Cracraft
Date: 21:13:39 07/16/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 16, 2004 at 20:04:53, Dann Corbit wrote: ...snip... Curious. When I changed the replacement strategy from "replace only if position to be stored has a search depth > than the one being replaced" to either >= or always-replace, the PV's all started looking better. Not just in the opening position of the original test but throughout a game. I am curious as to why this might be as I thought the replacement strategy was important but wouldn't introduce pathology. 1. e2e4 0.00 31 21 e2e4 2. e2e4 0.00 0 87 e2e4 e7e5 3. e2e4 0.01 17 276 e2e4 e7e5 f1c4 4. e2e4 0.02 0 1721 e2e4 e7e5 f1c4 f8c5 5. e2e4 0.08 17 7608 e2e4 e7e5 g1f3 d7d6 d2d4 6. e2e4 0.30 0 31025 e2e4 e7e5 f1c4 f8c5 d2d3 d7d6 7. e2e4 1.17 17 120316 e2e4 e7e5 f1c4 d7d6 b1c3 g8f6 d2d3 8. e2e4 3.97 0 395322 e2e4 e7e5 d2d3 g8f6 b1c3 d7d6 g1f3 b8d7 e2e4 3.97 0 395322 e2e4 e7e5 d2d3 g8f6 b1c3 d7d6 g1f3 b8d7 nps=99477 ha=29.00% q=80.0% bc=70% br=3.2% mp=178<>178 pawnx=0 recapx=0 qcheckx=24053 checkx=0 futilx=0 qfutilx=34189 Stuart
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.