Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 21:55:50 07/16/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 17, 2004 at 00:13:39, Stuart Cracraft wrote: >On July 16, 2004 at 20:04:53, Dann Corbit wrote: > >...snip... > >Curious. When I changed the replacement strategy >from "replace only if position to be stored has >a search depth > than the one being replaced" to >either >= or always-replace, the PV's all started >looking better. Not just in the opening position >of the original test but throughout a game. > >I am curious as to why this might be as I thought >the replacement strategy was important but wouldn't >introduce pathology. > >1. e2e4 0.00 31 21 e2e4 >2. e2e4 0.00 0 87 e2e4 e7e5 >3. e2e4 0.01 17 276 e2e4 e7e5 f1c4 >4. e2e4 0.02 0 1721 e2e4 e7e5 f1c4 f8c5 >5. e2e4 0.08 17 7608 e2e4 e7e5 g1f3 d7d6 d2d4 >6. e2e4 0.30 0 31025 e2e4 e7e5 f1c4 f8c5 d2d3 d7d6 >7. e2e4 1.17 17 120316 e2e4 e7e5 f1c4 d7d6 b1c3 g8f6 d2d3 >8. e2e4 3.97 0 395322 e2e4 e7e5 d2d3 g8f6 b1c3 d7d6 g1f3 b8d7 >e2e4 3.97 0 395322 e2e4 e7e5 d2d3 g8f6 b1c3 d7d6 g1f3 b8d7 >nps=99477 ha=29.00% q=80.0% bc=70% br=3.2% mp=178<>178 >pawnx=0 recapx=0 qcheckx=24053 checkx=0 futilx=0 qfutilx=34189 Dumb question: You do have the side to move included in the hash?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.