Author: Mark Young
Date: 11:04:54 12/28/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 28, 1998 at 12:02:39, blass uri wrote: > >On December 28, 1998 at 09:39:50, Mark Young wrote: > >>On December 28, 1998 at 08:05:30, blass uri wrote: >> >>> >>>On December 28, 1998 at 07:39:45, Didzis Cirulis wrote: >>> >>>>Hi, >>>> >>>>I had no much time for chess last days, but still I have played two more games >>>>of "Chessmaster 6000 against the World" test. In the last game (round 9) CM6000 >>>>went on for a furious attack, but probably missed a win at some point. Feel free >>>>to analyze the game and find it out yourself. >>>> >>>>Chess Tiger 11.7 is leading 4:1 >>>> >>>>[Event "CT 11.7 Test"] >>>>[Site "Home"] >>>>[Date "1998.12.27"] >>>>[Round "9"] >>>>[White "CM 6000"] >>>>[Black "CT 11.7"] >>>>[Result "0-1"] >>>> >>>>1. d4 d5 2. c4 dxc4 3. e4 e5 4. Nf3 exd4 5. Bxc4 Nc6 6. O-O Nf6 7. e5 Ne4 >>>>8. Re1 Nc5 9. Bg5 Qd7 10. b4 Nxb4 11. e6 Nxe6 12. Ne5 Qd6 13. Qf3 f6 >>>>14. Qh5+ g6 15. Nxg6 hxg6 16. Qxg6+ Kd7 17. Bxe6+ Kc6 18. Qe4+ Kb6 >>>>19. Bf4 Qc6 20. Nd2 Qxe4 21. Rxe4 c5 22. a3 f5 23. Re5 Nd3 24. Rb1+ Ka5 >>>>25. Nc4+ Ka6 26. Bxc8 Rxc8 27. Rxf5 Nxf4 28. Rxf4 b6 29. Rf7 Re8 30. f4 Re4 >>>>31. Rc1 Re2 32. a4 d3 33. Rd1 Re4 34. Nd2 Rxa4 35. g4 c4 36. Ne4 Bb4 >>>>37. Rc7 b5 38. Rd7 Rh4 39. h3 Rxh3 40. f5 c3 41. Kg2 c2 42. Rc1 Re3 >>>>43. Rh1 Ka5 44. Rxa7+ Kb6 45. Rd7 Rxe4 46. Rh6+ Kc5 47. Rc7+ Kd5 >>>>48. Rh1 Rxg4+ 49. Kf2 Bc5+ 50. Rxc5+ Kxc5 51. Ke3 Rg3+ 52. Kf2 d2 >>>>53. Kxg3 c1=Q 54. Rxc1+ dxc1=Q 55. Kg2 Qd2+ 56. Kf3 Qd3+ 57. Kg2 Ra2+ >>>>58. Kh1 Qf1 0-1 >>>> >>>>Didzis >>>> >>>>http://www.konts.lv/usr/Didzis/index.html >>>>http://open.konts.lv/usr/Didzis/ >>> >>>I think that 1 hour per game on Pentium200 is not enough for chessmaster. >>>The good results of chessmaster were on a faster computer with 90 minutes per 40 >>>moves >>> >>>I expect chessmaster6000 to lose also some other matches against the world >>>because of this reason. >>> >>I also think you are correct. Chessmaster 6000 default is a bit behind the other >>top programs at fast chess or at a bit longer time controls on a slower >>computer. >> >>I would bet a human player would find Chessmaster 6000 a stronger player at fast >>chess then most other programs, because in many of its games at fast time >>controls playing other computers. Chessmaster 6000 many times has a better >>position only to be caught by a tactical shot that most human would not find. >> >>Chessmaster 6000 defaults bit weaker play when playing other computers seems to >>turn around at about 1 min a move on my P II 400. And from that time control on >>the the gap widens more in more in favor of Chessmaster 6000 default. I am >>finding this when playing other chess programs or other chessmaster >>personalities > > >Did you try the default against the default with selective search=10 at long >time control? Yes, ss=10 is maybe a bit stronger, it is +2 after 14 games. It is for sure faster at many tactical positions. And is stronger at faster time controls. At slow chess they are pretty close. I find them the best 2 settings, if one is really better playing humans and other computers I'm not sure. I will have to play ss=10 and default and play them against other programs to tell for sure. We now how good default is, if ss=10 is a bit better also at playing other programs and humans look out.:) > >Uri >> >> >> >>>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.