Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:30:44 07/19/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 19, 2004 at 08:21:06, Uri Blass wrote: >On July 19, 2004 at 07:32:13, George Tsavdaris wrote: > >>On July 19, 2004 at 06:32:51, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On July 19, 2004 at 06:31:09, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>Two draws and one lost against players with average rating of 2450 FIDE. >>>> >> >> Shredder 8 has three draws so far and one loss. >> >> Since the avarage FIDE-ELO rating of the 9 players so far is 2.426 and Shredder >>has 6.5 out of 9 then it has a performance rating of 2.592. >> If it wins the 2 games remaining then it would have 2.644. >> >> >> And this is how it performed during the tournament: >>R2)----->2.549 >>R3)----->2.684 >>R4)----->2.738 >>R5)----->2.661 >>R6)----->2.704 >>R7)----->2.710 >>R8)----->2.664 >>R9)----->2.592 ......If it won it would have 2.706 and this is the result of >>the 31...Rxg2?? move. > >It could not win even without Rxg2 and the best it could do without that move is >maybe a draw. > >I am not sure if a draw was possible for it(after all white was a pawn up and >had pair of bishops). >It does not change the fact that Rxg2 is a strange mistake. > >Uri Note also that I do not see in the chessbase site report about a single loss of shredder and it has 5/6 in both tournaments: It is clear based on the schedule that round 9 was played but there is no report about results there. see http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=1791 Is there a link that confirm the loss except the post that I read in this forum including games? Are you sure that the pgn is correct(maybe the reason for the Rxg2 is that there was a mistake in the pgn that was posted)? Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.