Author: Albert Silver
Date: 06:43:48 07/19/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 19, 2004 at 04:47:05, Bigler David wrote:
>On July 19, 2004 at 04:11:43, Daniel Jackson wrote:
>
>>On July 19, 2004 at 03:49:18, Bigler David wrote:
>>
>>>On July 19, 2004 at 03:24:03, Daniel Jackson wrote:
>>>
>>>>On July 19, 2004 at 01:48:26, Peter Skinner wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Is the list at:
>>>>>
>>>>>http://w1.859.telia.com/~u85924109/ssdf/
>>>>>
>>>>>The most recent?
>>>>
>>>>Yes:)
>>>>
>>>>Do you think Deep Junior will surpass S8?
>>>>I think it will be close, we'll see.
>>>
>>>Hi !
>>>
>>>About which Deep Junior are you speaking ?
>>The WCCC 2004
>>>If it is the one that played during the WCCC 2004, it has not yet been released.
>>>So you can still wait a moment before seeing it in the SSDF list.
>>
>>Oh yeah, it will take awhile
>>>
>>>And Deep Junior 8 is "far" from S8.
>>
>>Maybe...
>>
>>I think Deep Junior on the list may be underated? Even Junior 8 did far better
>>than it's multiprcessor counterpart! That's odd, maybe Deep Junior 8 didn't do
>>as well due to the fact it was run on a single processor?
>>>
>>>OK, I am also looking forward to see the next Junior.
>>>
>>>with Best regards
>>
>>I guess most of us are..
>>
>>Regards,
>>Daniel
>
>I have Deep Junior 8 and Junior 8
>
>What I do not understand is that Junior 8 is much faster than Deep Junior 8 on
>my single CPU. (AMD 64-3500+).
>I know that the Deep Junior version should be a bit slower but not within the
>difference I had.
>So this difference for me explains the SSDF result.
>
>regards
I don't have the more recent Juniors (last I have is Junior 7), but could you
run the Junior Mark for both engines and see what you get?
Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.