Author: Bigler David
Date: 06:53:55 07/19/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 19, 2004 at 09:43:48, Albert Silver wrote: >On July 19, 2004 at 04:47:05, Bigler David wrote: > >>On July 19, 2004 at 04:11:43, Daniel Jackson wrote: >> >>>On July 19, 2004 at 03:49:18, Bigler David wrote: >>> >>>>On July 19, 2004 at 03:24:03, Daniel Jackson wrote: >>>> >>>>>On July 19, 2004 at 01:48:26, Peter Skinner wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Is the list at: >>>>>> >>>>>>http://w1.859.telia.com/~u85924109/ssdf/ >>>>>> >>>>>>The most recent? >>>>> >>>>>Yes:) >>>>> >>>>>Do you think Deep Junior will surpass S8? >>>>>I think it will be close, we'll see. >>>> >>>>Hi ! >>>> >>>>About which Deep Junior are you speaking ? >>>The WCCC 2004 >>>>If it is the one that played during the WCCC 2004, it has not yet been released. >>>>So you can still wait a moment before seeing it in the SSDF list. >>> >>>Oh yeah, it will take awhile >>>> >>>>And Deep Junior 8 is "far" from S8. >>> >>>Maybe... >>> >>>I think Deep Junior on the list may be underated? Even Junior 8 did far better >>>than it's multiprcessor counterpart! That's odd, maybe Deep Junior 8 didn't do >>>as well due to the fact it was run on a single processor? >>>> >>>>OK, I am also looking forward to see the next Junior. >>>> >>>>with Best regards >>> >>>I guess most of us are.. >>> >>>Regards, >>>Daniel >> >>I have Deep Junior 8 and Junior 8 >> >>What I do not understand is that Junior 8 is much faster than Deep Junior 8 on >>my single CPU. (AMD 64-3500+). >>I know that the Deep Junior version should be a bit slower but not within the >>difference I had. >>So this difference for me explains the SSDF result. >> >>regards > >I don't have the more recent Juniors (last I have is Junior 7), but could you >run the Junior Mark for both engines and see what you get? > > Albert i will try to... and let you know when results are available. rgds
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.