Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:43:15 07/19/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 19, 2004 at 15:28:55, Joachim Rang wrote: >On July 19, 2004 at 14:55:33, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>If Ruffian 2.10 had participated in WCCC 2004, it could had been the best single >>processor. > >most likely indeed ;-) I do not know. 2.5-1.5 is not enough games to decide if Ruffian is better than Jonny and there is no big difference between Ruffian2.1.0 and Ruffian1.0.5 I think that it is important not to underestimate Jonny's good result in WCCC including draws against the top programs inspite of significantly inferior hardware. Remember also that Jonny had practically more time in WCCC because of pondering that is clearly enough compensation for the faster time control and had also better hardware than the hardware that is used in this match. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.