Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 14:24:16 07/19/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 19, 2004 at 15:43:15, Uri Blass wrote: >On July 19, 2004 at 15:28:55, Joachim Rang wrote: > >>On July 19, 2004 at 14:55:33, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>If Ruffian 2.10 had participated in WCCC 2004, it could had been the best single >>>processor. >> >>most likely indeed ;-) > >I do not know. > >2.5-1.5 is not enough games to decide if Ruffian is better than Jonny and there >is no big difference between Ruffian2.1.0 and Ruffian1.0.5 I did not implied that Ruffian 1.0.5 is better than Jonny 2.64, simply that Ruffian 2.10 could also had the best performance of the Single processor. But if Ruffian 1.0.5 out of 4 games achieved equality using the same hardware, also Ruffian 2.10 on an AMD 64 3200 FX could had done the same against the big boys. Plus the total games played against each opponent on the WCCC 2004 was only 2, therefore all that we need is to get your version of Movei, Crafty 19.15 Crazy Bishop and Jonny 2.64 and played each other only 4 games wich would be more than the games played on the WCCC. It would be nice if Falcon becomes freely available in order to do the comparison. Jorge >I think that it is important not to underestimate Jonny's good result in WCCC >including draws against the top programs inspite of significantly inferior >hardware. > >Remember also that Jonny had practically more time in WCCC because of pondering >that is clearly enough compensation for the faster time control and had also >better hardware than the hardware that is used in this match. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.