Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 01:19:14 07/20/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 20, 2004 at 03:38:24, Graham Banks wrote:
>On July 20, 2004 at 03:31:18, Drexel,Michael wrote:
>
>>On July 20, 2004 at 01:09:49, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>
>>>On July 20, 2004 at 00:15:56, Graham Banks wrote:
>>>
>>>>STANDINGS (after 20 of 68 rounds)
>>>>
>>>>Pharaon 2.62 - 14.0
>>>>Tao 5.6 - 12.5
>>>>List 512 - 12.5
>>>>SOS 4 - 12.0
>>>>Gandalf 5.1 - 11.5
>>>>Delfi 4.5 - 11.5
>>>>Deep Sjeng 1.6 - 11.0
>>>>Little Goliath Revival-10.5
>>>>El Chinito 3.25 - 10.5
>>>>Thinker 4.6c - 10.5
>>>>Gothmog 1.0b7 - 9.5
>>>>Anaconda 1.6.2 - 9.0
>>>>Rebel 12 - 8.5
>>>>Yace 0.99.87 - 8.5
>>>>Crafty 19.15 - 8.0
>>>>Comet B68 - 8.0
>>>>Slow Chess 2.93a - 6.0
>>>>Fruit 1.5 - 6.0
>>
>>Results of two test Blitz tourneys over night:
>>
>>5+3,Athlon 2.4 Ghz
>>
>>1.Shredder8 10/15
>>2.Hiarcs 9 8.5/15
>>3.Fritz 8 8.5/15
>>4.Crafty 19.15 3/15
>>
>>2+1,Athlon 2.2 Ghz
>>
>>1.Shredder 8 11/15
>>2.Fritz 8 10/15
>>3.Hiarcs 9 7.5/15
>>4.Crafty 19.15 1.5/15
>>
>>all engines Chessbase native
>>
>>Michael
>
>
>Crafty has always struggled on my Athlon 2000. This has disappointed me as it is
>by all accounts a fine program. On my friend's dual Athlon with ponder on,
>Crafty has consistently performed to a higher level though.
>Just shows though the strength of computer chess these days. There is an
>abundance of very strong programs now.
>Graham.
Hi Graham
Is this a further proof that there is a significant
difference in playing strength of Crafty between
ponder=on/ponder=off. Should this indeed be the case
it would perhaps be better to cancel Crafty 19.15 SE
in our coming AT 2004 tournament. I do not like to
produce bad results for an engine when it is known
that our playing conditions (ponder=off) do handicap
Crafty.
Kurt [http://www.utzingerk.com]
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.