Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 02:32:35 07/20/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 20, 2004 at 03:34:25, Graham Banks wrote: >On July 20, 2004 at 01:09:49, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>On July 20, 2004 at 00:15:56, Graham Banks wrote: >> >>>STANDINGS (after 20 of 68 rounds) >>> >>>Pharaon 2.62 - 14.0 >>>Tao 5.6 - 12.5 >>>List 512 - 12.5 >>>SOS 4 - 12.0 >>>Gandalf 5.1 - 11.5 >>>Delfi 4.5 - 11.5 >>>Deep Sjeng 1.6 - 11.0 >>>Little Goliath Revival- 10.5 >>>El Chinito 3.25 - 10.5 >>>Thinker 4.6c - 10.5 >>>Gothmog 1.0b7 - 9.5 >>>Anaconda 1.6.2 - 9.0 >>>Rebel 12 - 8.5 >>>Yace 0.99.87 - 8.5 >>>Crafty 19.15 - 8.0 >>>Comet B68 - 8.0 >>>Slow Chess 2.93a - 6.0 >>>Fruit 1.5 - 6.0 >>> >>> >> >> Hi Graham >> Still Pharaon 2.62 leading: what a surprise. >> And for me somewhat disappointing the behaviour >> of Crafty 19.15 and I am therefore wondering >> whether you are playing with the CB-version? >> Of course: still to less games played ...... >> Kind regards >> Kurt [http://www.utzingerk.com] > > >Hi Kurt, >I'm using the CB version of Crafty 19.15. The wcrafty for AMD had scored 7/20 >before I replaced it with CB Crafty and reran all the games. >Pharaon really seems to like the extra hash! In my previous 40/40 it was >struggling down the other end of the table. Mind you, it was up against the top >engines in that tournament. >Graham. Did you use the computer command in the crafty.rc file? Did you use the Chessbase - GUI? Unfortunately the WB-Crafty is somehow crippled in its playing strength in the chessbase-GUI do to the fact, that the WB2UCI-Commander sends commands, which crafty interpretates like afer every move there starts a new game. Do you now use the "asymmetric Evaluation" off? regards Joachim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.