Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Revised ECM Test Suite (update)

Author: Vincent Lejeune

Date: 12:24:34 07/20/04

Go up one level in this thread


On July 20, 2004 at 15:17:43, Vincent Lejeune wrote:

>I can run shredder 8 on one or more position for the next 5 days on a centrino
>1.7, please, let me know the more interresting/schemer positions !
>
>
>On July 20, 2004 at 11:36:05, Omid David Tabibi wrote:
>
>>http://www.cs.biu.ac.il/~davoudo/pubs/ecmx.epd
>>
>>Remaining positions that are still unclear (the winning line is not clear):
>>
>>r3r1k1/pp3ppp/1qp5/2bbNQ2/5B2/2P5/PP3PPP/3RR1K1 w - - bm Rxd5; id "ECM.349";
>>r3k1r1/pb1qpp1p/1pnp1n1B/2p2R2/3PP3/2P3PN/P1P3BP/R2Q3K b q - bm Nxe4; id
>>"ECM.561";
>>8/p5k1/2p2p2/4p1p1/1p2P3/1P4PP/1PP5/5K2 b - - bm g4; id "ECM.601";
>>4r2k/3n1Qpp/1pRP1p2/p4P2/1p1P2P1/6rP/P3q1B1/6RK w - - bm Qe6; id "ECM.624";
>>Isn't 1.Rc2 at least as good as Qe6?
>>r1b2rk1/1pq2ppp/p1p1p3/2n1P3/2N2P2/3B4/PPP3PP/R2Q1RK1 w - - bm Bxh7+; id
>>"ECM.677";
>>2k3r1/ppq2p1p/n1Pb1p2/8/6r1/4BN1b/PPQ2PPP/R3RBK1 b - - bm Bxh2+; id "ECM.698";
>>5rk1/5rp1/p2qb3/R2Np2Q/3bP2B/7P/P5PK/1R6 b - - bm Rf1; id "ECM.856";
>>3r1rk1/p3q1pp/2Rb4/3P4/8/1P2Qp2/PB3PPP/3R2K1 b - - bm Bxh2+; id "ECM.858";
>>8/2q1np1k/6p1/1PPn3p/8/P2Q3P/6P1/2R4K b - - bm Nf5; id "ECM.864";
>>7R/1p1r4/2b2p2/2Pp1qk1/3P1bp1/3N4/2Q2PB1/6K1 w - - bm Rg8+; id "ECM.866";
>>r6r/1pn1b1k1/2p1pq2/2Pp3p/p2P1Pp1/P2BP1P1/1P2QB2/3R2KR w - - bm Rxh5; id
>>"ECM.867";


I'm planning 12h on this position with the 2 best moves

[d]4r2k/3n1Qpp/1pRP1p2/p4P2/1p1P2P1/6rP/P3q1B1/6RK w - -
bm Qe6; id "ECM.624"; Isn't 1.Rc2 at least as good as Qe6?



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.