Author: Uri Blass
Date: 10:19:27 07/21/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 21, 2004 at 12:48:58, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On July 21, 2004 at 12:03:11, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >>On July 20, 2004 at 16:45:06, Pierre Bourget wrote: >> >>>[Event "VII Magistral de la República Argentina"] >>>[Site "Buenos Aires"] >>>[Date "2004.07.20"] >>>[Round "11"] >>>[White "Panno, Oscar"] >>>[Black "Shredder 8"] >>>[Result "1/2-1/2"] >>>[ECO "A30"] >>>[WhiteElo "2474"] >>>[PlyCount "40"] >>>[EventDate "2004.07.09"] >>>[Source "lmi"] >>>[SourceDate "2003.07.22"] >>> >>>1. Nf3 c5 2. c4 Nf6 3. Nc3 e6 4. g3 b6 5. Bg2 Bb7 6. O-O Be7 7. b3 O-O 8. Bb2 >>>a6 9. e3 d6 10. Qe2 Nbd7 11. Rfd1 Qc7 12. d4 Rae8 13. Ne1 cxd4 14. exd4 Bxg2 >>>15. Nxg2 d5 16. cxd5 Nxd5 17. Nxd5 exd5 18. Rac1 Qb7 19. Qd3 Nf6 20. Rc2 Bd6 >>>1/2-1/2 >>> >>>So final score +5 =5 -1 , 7.5/11 >> >> >>With 7,5/11 ist S8 exactlly on the GM norm (gm norm was by category 8 here 7,5 >>points). >> >>But: a GM you can find with elo 2400 too! >> >>A super GM have 2700 Elo >> >>The ssdf needs us suggest (with 2818 elo) that s8 is an super gm, and this is >>not the case! >> >>Eduard > >The SSDF rating list only rates computer programs versus programs and it doesn't >correlate to humans Fide rating, but I do agree with you that the SSDF should >make one more adjustment by lowering their SSDF rating List by 100 Elo in order >to make it more comparable to the human FIDE rating. > >Jorge No I see no reason to compare between them. I think that they should increase the rating by 123456789 elo so nobody will try to compare between ssdf and humans rating. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.