Author: Matthew Hull
Date: 20:15:06 07/21/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 21, 2004 at 21:11:22, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >[D] 2R2b1r/3nkp2/B2pp1p1/1N4Pn/P3P3/4BP2/1r5q/3QK1R1 w - - > >Zappa: 2x1.8 > >1. Rg1-g4 f7-f5 2. Be3-g1 Qh2-e5 3. Bg1-d4 Nh5-g7 4. Rg4-g1 Qe5-h2 5. e4xf5 >Qh2-h4 6. Ke1-f1 > = (1.08) Depth: 9/28 00:00:05.92 6766kN (1142 KN/s, 461 splits) >1. Rg1-g4-- > - (0.83) Depth: 10/28 00:00:06.57 7658kN (1165 KN/s, 468 splits) >1. Rg1-g4-- > - (0.83) Depth: 10/30 00:00:11.47 14384kN (1253 KN/s, 730 splits) >1. Rg1-g4 f7-f5 2. Be3-g1 Qh2-e5 3. Bg1-d4 Nh5-g3 4. Bd4xb2 Rh8-h1 5. Ke1-f2 >Ng3xe4 6. f3xe4 Qe5xb2 7. Qd1-c2 Qb2xc2 8. Rc8xc2 f5xg4 > = (-1.19) Depth: 10/30 00:00:14.75 18707kN (1268 KN/s, 751 splits) >1. Nb5-d4 Qh2-h4 2. Ke1-f1 Qh4-h3 3. Kf1-e1 Qh3-h4 > = (0.00) Depth: 10/30 00:00:22.33 28728kN (1286 KN/s, 808 splits) > >Zappa: 1x1.8 > >1. Rg1-g4 f7-f5 2. Be3-g1 Qh2-e5 3. Bg1-d4 Nh5-g7 4. Rg4-g1 Qe5-h2 5. e4xf5 >Qh2-h4 6. Ke1-f1 > = (1.08) Depth: 9/26 00:00:09.01 5713kN (633 KN/s, 0 splits) >1. Rg1-g4-- > - (0.83) Depth: 10/26 00:00:10.13 6524kN (644 KN/s, 0 splits) >1. Rg1-g4-- > - (0.83) Depth: 10/32 00:00:21.09 14088kN (668 KN/s, 0 splits) >1. Rg1-g4 f7-f5 2. Be3-g1 Qh2-e5 3. Bg1-d4 Nh5-g3 4. Bd4xb2 Rh8-h1 5. Ke1-f2 >Ng3xe4 6. f3xe4 Qe5xb2 7. Qd1-c2 Qb2xc2 8. Rc8xc2 f5xg4 > = (-1.19) Depth: 10/32 00:00:25.81 17343kN (672 KN/s, 0 splits) >1. Nb5-d4 Qh2-h4 2. Ke1-f1 Qh4-h3 3. Kf1-e1 Qh3-h4 > = (0.00) Depth: 10/32 00:00:48.41 32288kN (667 KN/s, 0 splits) > >The >2 speedup exposes my poor eval and move ordering :( Of course, I'm pretty >happy it is all working, but I am sure there are some bugs left . . . > >anthony Did you end up using threads for your parrallel search?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.