Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Aristarch 4.50 is a little bit stronger :-)

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 11:15:04 07/22/04

Go up one level in this thread


On July 22, 2004 at 14:05:41, Jorge Pichard wrote:

>On July 22, 2004 at 13:56:23, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>
>>Arena tournament
>>
>>Rank	Engine	Score		Jo	                Ar               S-B
>>1	Aristarch 4.50	9.0/12	· · · · · · · · · · · ·	111111=010=1	 27.00
>>2	Jonny 2.64 	3.0/12	000000=101=0	· · · · · · · · · · · ·	 27.00
>>
>>
>>12 of 12 games played
>>Tournament start: 2004.07.21, 19:18:05
>>Latest update: 2004.07.22, 17:43:41
>>Site/ Country: S0025128408, United States
>>Level: Blitz 60/0
>>Hardware: AMD Athlon(tm) Processor 1202 MHz
>>Operating system: Microsoft Windows XP Build 2195
>>PGN-File: C:\Program Files\Arena\Arena.pgn
>>Table created with: Arena 1.09p1
>>
>>
>>Aristarch was using the Mainbook by Harry Schnapp and Jonny was using the Wizard
>>Book.
>
>PS: I believe that Aristarch is a little bit stronger no matter what Opening
>Book I use, even if I decide to swap the opening Books. I decided to continue
>this match up to 20 games :-)

Maybe the result may be better for Jonny if you use longer time control.

 60 minutes per game on 1202 Mhz AMD(ponder off) is probably more than 5 times
faster than the WCCC time control after you consider pondering and better
hardware.

If you want to simulate something similiar to WCCC conditions then you should
try at least 5 hours per game with your hardware.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.