Author: Daniel Jackson
Date: 21:23:43 07/22/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 22, 2004 at 16:49:02, John Merlino wrote: >On July 22, 2004 at 03:40:26, Peter McKenzie wrote: > >>[D]1k1r3r/ppp1q1p1/4bp2/2p4p/3nPp2/1PNP1P2/P1PQB1PP/R3R2K b - - >> >>This position occurred in KnightCap-Warp in the Australasian Champs the other >>day. Warp played the rather dim h4, when g5 seems like a much better option. >>After h4?! h3 black's chances of breaking through on the k-side have vanished. >> >>Do any other engines have this problem, or is it just some Warp specific brian >>damage? >> >>cheers, >>Peter > >CM9_SKR on an AMD 2500 says: > >Time Depth Score Positions Moves >0:00 1/3 -0.87 862 1...g5 2.a3 Rhe8 >0:00 1/4 -0.97 2347 1...g5 2.a4 Rhe8 3.Nb5 Bd7 >0:00 1/5 -0.89 8730 1...g5 2.a4 Bxb3 3.cxb3 Nxb3 4.Qb2 > Nxa1 5.Rxa1 >0:00 1/5 -0.91 11091 1...Rhe8 2.a4 Qd6 3.a5 g6 >0:00 1/6 -0.96 24470 1...Rhe8 2.a4 g5 3.Nb5 h4 4.Qa5 a6 >0:00 1/6 -1.18 86710 1...h4 2.a3 h3 3.Bf1 hxg2+ 4.Bxg2 > g6 >0:00 1/7 -1.34 145146 1...h4 2.h3 Qd6 3.a4 g6 4.a5 Rde8 >0:01 1/8 -1.27 265689 1...h4 2.Bf1 h3 3.Ne2 hxg2+ 4.Bxg2 > g5 5.Nxd4 cxd4 6.c3 >0:02 1/9 -1.36 600556 1...h4 2.Bf1 h3 3.Ne2 hxg2+ 4.Bxg2 > g5 5.Nxd4 cxd4 6.Qa5 Qh7 >0:05 1/10 -1.36 1229407 1...h4 2.Bf1 h3 3.Ne2 hxg2+ 4.Bxg2 > g5 5.Nxd4 cxd4 6.Qa5 Qh7 >0:24 1/11 -1.36 5307643 1...h4 2.h3 g5 3.Bf1 Rhe8 4.Na4 > Bd7 5.c3 Bxa4 6.cxd4 Bd7 >1:05 1/12 -1.36 14485135 1...h4 2.h3 g5 3.Na4 Rhe8 4.Qc3 > b6 5.Qd2 Qd7 6.Bf1 Bf7 7.Nc3 >3:03 1/13 -1.28 41577080 1...h4 2.h3 Qd6 3.a4 Nc6 4.Bf1 > Bf7 5.Reb1 Qe5 6.a5 f5 7.Re1 Rh6 > >jm There is nothing "dim" about h4 at all, infact it's a very good move! If White plays h3, Black has weaked his K-Side! Daniel Chess Master
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.