Author: Reynolds Takata
Date: 00:04:51 12/30/98
Go up one level in this thread
What i was reffering to is pure chess strength, if you want to say pure chess strength of a program against kasparov specifically well that would be perfectly satisfactory with me :). > >On December 29, 1998 at 17:48:56, Reynolds Takata wrote: > >> It has been quoted that Kasparov has Junior 5 on his computer. He stated that >>it played better than fritz, as if fritz was indeed the standard(my take on it >>anyway) especially considering also that F5 was his choice of engine in his comp >>chess match with Topalov(though this could be just because it works so well with >>chessbase?). Further it is apparent that, he knows about other programs since >>he mentioned "Rebel" beating Anand. Yet he still only mentioned J5, of course >>saying he thinks J5 is the best is only conjecture on my part. Does anyone have >>any info on the subject? > >It is not clear what do you mean by the best program(The best at blitz and The >best at tournament time control are probably different programs) > >The playing strength is also a question of against who do you play. > >If you use the program for analysis then this is also a question of what games >do you analyze. > >Another fact is that the best program to help a player in a match does not have >to be the best program but the best program in finding ideas that you do not >think. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.