Author: José Carlos
Date: 06:02:59 07/26/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 26, 2004 at 08:05:39, Daniel Clausen wrote: >On July 26, 2004 at 03:51:37, Scott Gasch wrote: > >>>> >>>>Bad idea. Start the next iteration even if you don't think you will have time >>>>to finish it. You might fail low. Wouldn't that be nice to know? :) >>>> >>> >>>Assume you have timed out at about the point a faillow has occurred. What >>>do you do now with your time? After all, using time wisely... :-) >> >>I set s soft time limit and a hard time limit. When the soft one runs out I >>move unless: >> >>1. I'm resolving a root fail high or fail low > >Just curious, why do you want to resolve a root fail high? To verify it's really >a fail-high? > >Sargon Or to get a move to ponder, possibly... José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.