Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Can anybody tell me why chessmaster 6000 is so bad ?

Author: Dan Kiski

Date: 11:29:01 12/30/98

Go up one level in this thread


On December 30, 1998 at 14:18:51, rich wrote:

>I expected cm 6000 to act in a serious and proffessional way.
>Sadly, it is still a programme for little children.(compare with fritz and
>rebel).CM6000 has an inadequate opening book, there are bugs everywhere, and the
>tutorials are only for beginners.Also CMlive(mplayer.com)is so slow and
>frustrating that I deleted it after trying once.
>The only thing I like are Waitszszszszkins annotated games.
>Also analyzing a game with cm 6000 is hopeless.
>Has anyone noticed that CM sometimes starts to think when it still is in the
>book ? ( for example after e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cd Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3)
>I'm very disappointed at CM 6000. Does anyone feel the same way ?
>It seems that mindscape has a lot to learn.

This subject has been a well travelled road recently check back about a week ago
you will see endless posts on the pros and cons of CM6000.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.