Author: Ricardo Gibert
Date: 17:18:54 07/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 27, 2004 at 19:50:44, John Merlino wrote: >On July 26, 2004 at 21:43:53, Ricardo Gibert wrote: > >>On July 26, 2004 at 21:21:18, John Merlino wrote: >> >>>On July 26, 2004 at 18:43:49, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >>> >>>>On July 26, 2004 at 15:47:14, Volker Richey wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>http://www.vrichey.de/dortmund2004/dortmund2004games.htm >>>> >>>>Karjakin got a nice position as Black in his other game against Kramnik too: >>>> >>>>[D] 3rrnk1/3q1bpp/p4p2/P7/2ppP2N/3P3R/2P2QPP/2B2RK1 b - - >>>> >>>>Instead of 28...cxd3 29.cxd3 Re5 30.Bd2 draw agreed, he could try 28...Re5 >>>>29.Rg3 Ng6 (29...Bg6 30.Ba3) 30.Nf5 Be6 (30...Rxa5 31.Nxf7) 31.Nh4 Qf7 32.Nf3 >>>>Rxa5 33.Nxd4 Ra2 which looks better for Black. >>>> >>>>I predict the kid will go far. A rating of at least 2600 elo is very possible ;) >>> >>>After 31.Nh4, Black has 31...Bg4! 32.Nxg6 hxg6 33.Bf4 Rc5 with a good position >>>as well. >> >>White can for example continue with 34.Bd6 which looks quite equal. This >>doesn't seem to be an improvement over the game continuation as far as I can >>tell. > >After 34.Bd6 Qxd6 35.Rxg4, we have this position: > >[D]3r2k1/6p1/p2q1pp1/P1r5/2ppP1R1/3P4/2P2QPP/5RK1 b - - 0 35 > >CM9_SKR says that Black is doing well with 35...Kf7 (this is on an AMD 2500): Of course you're right. It's awful for White and that should have been obvious to me. I must confess that I had trusted Ruffian here rather than taking a moment to think. Ruffian seems to have a bit more trouble understanding the position than CM9_SKR. > >Time Depth Score Positions Moves >0:00 1/3 -0.39 3738 8...Rh5 9.Rg3 Re8 10.Rb1 Rxa5 11.Rxg6 >0:00 1/4 -0.18 7239 8...Rh5 9.Qg3 Qxg3 10.Rxg3 Rxa5 > 11.Rxg6 >0:00 1/4 -0.41 9022 8...f5 9.Rg5 Qf6 10.Qg3 >0:00 1/4 -0.68 14106 8...g5 9.Ra1 Qc7 10.Ra4 Rb8 >0:00 1/5 -0.52 21651 8...g5 9.Ra1 Qc7 10.Qg3 Re5 11.Qe1 >0:00 1/6 -0.59 75724 8...g5 9.Qe1 Rb8 10.dxc4 Rxc4 11.e5 > fxe5 12.Rxg5 >0:00 1/7 -0.57 136511 8...g5 9.Qe1 Rb8 10.Qa1 Rbb5 11.Qa4 > Qe6 >0:01 1/8 -0.56 410550 8...g5 9.h4 Qe6 10.Qg3 Rxa5 11.Qc7 > Re8 12.Qxa5 Qxg4 13.hxg5 >0:03 1/8 -0.60 843168 8...Kf7 9.Ra1 Rb8 10.Qf4 Qxf4 11.Rxf4 > Rbb5 12.Ra4 Rb2 13.Rf2 >0:08 1/9 -0.51 2056467 8...Kf7 9.Ra1 Qc6 10.Qe1 cxd3 11.cxd3 > Rc2 12.Qb1 Qc3 13.Qb7+ Kg8 14.Rf1 > Qxd3 15.Rxg6 >0:22 1/10 -0.61 5557571 8...Kf7 9.Ra1 Qc6 10.Qe1 cxd3 11.cxd3 > Rb8 12.e5 Rxe5 13.Qf2 Rbb5 14.Qa2+ > Qd5 15.Rxd4 Qxa2 16.Rxa2 Rxa5 17.Rxa5 > Rxa5 >0:58 1/11 -0.63 14798397 8...Kf7 9.Ra1 Qc6 10.Qf1 cxd3 11.cxd3 > Rb8 12.Rf4 Rb2 13.Rf2 Rcc2 14.Rxc2 > Qxc2 >2:39 1/12 -0.67 41279508 8...Kf7 9.Qe1 Qc7 10.Rg3 Rxa5 11.Qe2 > Rh8 12.Qg4 Rh6 13.dxc4 Ra2 14.Rd1 > Qxc4 > >jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.