Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 09:41:40 07/28/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 28, 2004 at 12:24:58, Uri Blass wrote: >On July 28, 2004 at 12:01:43, Joachim Rang wrote: > >>On July 28, 2004 at 11:49:18, Keith Kaplon wrote: >> >>>I have no data on this. I remember Dr. Hyatt's machine won an impressive >>>computer tourney on ICC not too too long ago. >>> >>>I'm trying to set up an analysis program in Linux - and so far the only engines >>>I have which work in Linux are Crafty and Ruffian 2.0.2 and Ruffian 2.1.0 (and >>>of GNU chess). >>> >>>Any data much appreciated :-) >> >>on equal hardware most probably Ruffian. >> >>Here is a tournament when Ruffian scored slightly ahead of Crafty 19.12: >> >>http://wbec-ridderkerk.nl/html/his7thedition.html > >I think that it is dependent on the hardware that you use. > >You can also give both programs equal quad opteron(hardware that Crafty used to >win the ICC tournament) and I am not so sure that Ruffian is better. > >It is not fair to talk about the case that both programs get a single processor >and ignore the case that both program get 4 processors(the fact that Ruffian can >use only one of them is not the fault of Crafty). > >Uri oh come on Uri. Why play the pedantic nitpicker and highlightening _every inaccuracy_ which occur in some posts? Of course I should have written "on equal single-processor-hardware". Guess what? This formulation crossed my mind for a milisecond but I dropped it since I thought, that it is too obvious to mention it and only a deliberate nitpicker would highlighten it. regards Joachim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.