Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Enhanced Transposition Cutoff

Author: Daniel Shawul

Date: 03:17:16 07/29/04

Go up one level in this thread


On July 29, 2004 at 05:37:42, Volker Böhm wrote:

>On July 29, 2004 at 05:32:14, Daniel Shawul wrote:
>
>>On July 29, 2004 at 02:59:41, Volker Böhm wrote:
>>
>>>Hi Stuart,
>>>
>>>ETC didn´t work in my tests with. Spike uses PVS. If you got good results I´ll
>>>try again, perhaps I didn´t use the right positions.
>>
>>It didn't work for me too. But i didn't test it with positions.
>>i just checked nps and it wasn't improved.
>>daniel
>
>
>The test of nps seems funny to me. ETC should reduce the amount of nodes needed
>to calculate a position to a certain depth. It should not at all increase nps!
>

yeap you are right. i still attach improvement with increase in Nps.
i remeber there is no decrease in search time to depth 9.
best
daniel

>Greetings Volker
>>
>>>
>>>Volker



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.