Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:47:32 07/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 29, 2004 at 09:35:57, Daniel Shawul wrote:
>On July 29, 2004 at 09:21:10, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On July 29, 2004 at 09:05:50, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>
>>>[Event "Arena tournament"]
>>>[Site "S0025128408"]
>>>[Date "2004.07.29"]
>>>[Round "2"]
>>>[White "Baron140b2"]
>>>[Black "Movei00_8_251s"]
>>>[Result "1-0"]
>>>[ECO "A00"]
>>>[Opening "Clemenz (Mead-Basman-de Klerk-Welling) Opening"]
>>>[Time "00:11:54"]
>>>[TimeControl "1800+0"]
>>>[Termination "normal"]
>>>[PlyCount "121"]
>>>[WhiteType "program"]
>>>[BlackType "program"]
>>>
>>>1.h3 e5 {+0.23/11 28} 2.a3 Nf6 {+0.55/11 35}
>>
>>
>>This game suggests that opening book is not very important
>>Baron starts 1.h3 2.a3 and still wins.
>>
>>learning can be more important and baron could beat movei more convinicingly by
>>repeating this line again and again.
>>
>>Dann Corbit's book has no reply to 1.h3 so movei cannot learn.
> why don't you add the line if it is not in the book.
> danchess learning add played lines if not in the book and
> change weight if it is.
> daniel
If the program lost the game then what do you add when you do not want to repeat
a lost game?
Note that in this case I think that adding the first moves of the game could
help because in that case the program could have more time later and not blunder
but I do not like it as a general solution.
Uri
Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.