Author: Daniel Shawul
Date: 06:53:41 07/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 29, 2004 at 09:47:32, Uri Blass wrote:
>On July 29, 2004 at 09:35:57, Daniel Shawul wrote:
>
>>On July 29, 2004 at 09:21:10, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>On July 29, 2004 at 09:05:50, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>>
>>>>[Event "Arena tournament"]
>>>>[Site "S0025128408"]
>>>>[Date "2004.07.29"]
>>>>[Round "2"]
>>>>[White "Baron140b2"]
>>>>[Black "Movei00_8_251s"]
>>>>[Result "1-0"]
>>>>[ECO "A00"]
>>>>[Opening "Clemenz (Mead-Basman-de Klerk-Welling) Opening"]
>>>>[Time "00:11:54"]
>>>>[TimeControl "1800+0"]
>>>>[Termination "normal"]
>>>>[PlyCount "121"]
>>>>[WhiteType "program"]
>>>>[BlackType "program"]
>>>>
>>>>1.h3 e5 {+0.23/11 28} 2.a3 Nf6 {+0.55/11 35}
>>>
>>>
>>>This game suggests that opening book is not very important
>>>Baron starts 1.h3 2.a3 and still wins.
>>>
>>>learning can be more important and baron could beat movei more convinicingly by
>>>repeating this line again and again.
>>>
>>>Dann Corbit's book has no reply to 1.h3 so movei cannot learn.
>> why don't you add the line if it is not in the book.
>> danchess learning add played lines if not in the book and
>> change weight if it is.
>> daniel
>
>If the program lost the game then what do you add when you do not want to repeat
>a lost game?
after h3 movie played e5. next time around danchess will not play e5 again
and also the move afer a3. So it will be a completely different game if baron
plays a3 again.
daniel
>
>Note that in this case I think that adding the first moves of the game could
>help because in that case the program could have more time later and not blunder
>but I do not like it as a general solution.
>
>Uri
>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.