Author: Uri Blass
Date: 16:10:51 07/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 29, 2004 at 18:44:47, chandler yergin wrote: >On July 29, 2004 at 13:13:28, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On July 29, 2004 at 08:04:48, chandler yergin wrote: >> >>>On July 28, 2004 at 20:01:58, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>On July 28, 2004 at 19:56:03, Robin Smith wrote: >>>> >>>>>Intersting position and mis-evaluation by Fritz. Fritz has trouble with many >>>>>rook pawn and wrong color bishop positions. Can you please give how the game >>>>>ended? After a5 it should still be a draw, but White can't wait too much longer >>>>>to get to the h1 square. >>>>> >>>>>Robin >>>> >>>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?379533 >>>> >>>>If the game ended that way then it seems that the players clearly did not use >>>>Fritz to help them. >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>>Burkett DID Use Fritz! >>>That's all he has, and I am in daily contact with him. >>>His annotations after the game, inserted in the notes, was also by Fritz. >>> >>>The Full game, and analysis is posted in my reply to Robin. >>>Chan >> >> >>If I am not wrong Burkett was black when white blundered by missing a6 with a >>draw. >> >>Uri > > >Burkett was white! >Theyn both missed the Draw... so did Fritz! >That's my point.. based on the pgn he was black http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?379533 It is not important if black missed the draw but if white missed the draw. Fritz could find the drawing move Kc4 instead of a6. White could not find it so the fact is that white played worse than Fritz. The fact that Fritz could not see the draw is not important to justify mistakes because it could find the correct moves. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.