Author: Vincent Lejeune
Date: 06:54:02 07/31/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 31, 2004 at 09:31:49, Ernest Bonnem wrote: >Bonjour Vincent ! > >Where did you find that for Othello "...a comp prove first player is winning" ? No it was not proved what's the result with a perfect play, it was only proved humans, with all their intelligence and their understaning, are not able to understand the game as much as a computer. I wrote about that because a lot of poeple think the chess game is draw because a lot of high level human games are draw ; I think it's stupid :) > >I know this is true for Gomoku (morpion) but I have never seen that info for >Othello. > >On July 31, 2004 at 05:55:08, Vincent Lejeune wrote: > >>On July 31, 2004 at 01:05:03, Daniel Jackson wrote: >> >>>With balanced play, without error, chess is a draw....what else could it be? >>> >>>If God played God, it would be a draw, as each side would choose the "best" >>>move. >>> >>>I believe this has been solved mathematically. Even if it hasn't, logic dictates >>>a draw. White can't win due to one tempo. >> >>I think ideas like that are totally false, Othello seems draw too, no human >>achieved to prove a side was winning but a comp prove first player is winning, >>same thing for the pawn-game (proved winning for white in CCC) ... >> >>Nothing prove that "the only winning move in chess for white is not 1.b3" !!! >> >> >>(No offense to you Daniel ;) ... but only against some established thinking) >> >> >>> >>>Daniel >>> >>>P.S. 1.h3 is inferior but not a lost afaik.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.