Author: Uri Blass
Date: 09:38:48 07/31/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 31, 2004 at 09:54:02, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >On July 31, 2004 at 09:31:49, Ernest Bonnem wrote: > >>Bonjour Vincent ! >> >>Where did you find that for Othello "...a comp prove first player is winning" ? > >No it was not proved what's the result with a perfect play, it was only proved >humans, with all their intelligence and their understaning, are not able to >understand the game as much as a computer. > >I wrote about that because a lot of poeple think the chess game is draw because >a lot of high level human games are draw ; I think it's stupid :).0 I do not think that it is stupid. The fact that we do not know everything does not mean that we cannot have an opinion. By the same logic you can say that it is stupid to give the opinion that white is losing after 1.e4 Nf6 Qh5 because you cannot prove mathematically that white is losing the game and it may be possible that white can build some fortress after 2...Nxh5 and save the game. I have the opinion that chess is a draw. I am not sure at it as much as I am sure in another opinion that black is winning after 1.e4 Nf6 2.Qh5 Nxh5 but having that opinion based on the data that I know is logical and not stupid. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.