Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 10:04:27 07/31/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 31, 2004 at 12:38:48, Uri Blass wrote: >On July 31, 2004 at 09:54:02, Vincent Lejeune wrote: > >>On July 31, 2004 at 09:31:49, Ernest Bonnem wrote: >> >>>Bonjour Vincent ! >>> >>>Where did you find that for Othello "...a comp prove first player is winning" ? >> >>No it was not proved what's the result with a perfect play, it was only proved >>humans, with all their intelligence and their understaning, are not able to >>understand the game as much as a computer. >> >>I wrote about that because a lot of poeple think the chess game is draw because >>a lot of high level human games are draw ; I think it's stupid :).0 > >I do not think that it is stupid. > >The fact that we do not know everything does not mean that we cannot have an >opinion. > >By the same logic you can say that it is stupid to give the opinion that white >is losing after 1.e4 Nf6 Qh5 because you cannot prove mathematically that white >is losing the game and it may be possible that white can build some fortress >after 2...Nxh5 and save the game. > >I have the opinion that chess is a draw. >I am not sure at it as much as I am sure in another opinion that black is >winning after 1.e4 Nf6 2.Qh5 Nxh5 but having that opinion based on the data that >I know is logical and not stupid. > >Uri I still don't understand why Movei lost to Baron10.b2 with 1.h3?! e5! http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?379686
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.