Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 10:42:20 07/31/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 31, 2004 at 11:05:55, Rob Basham wrote: >On July 31, 2004 at 10:55:41, Drexel,Michael wrote: > >>On July 31, 2004 at 07:24:15, Mark Young wrote: >> >>>[d]3q3r/4b1k1/4P1p1/rpp2p1p/1nn2Q2/5N1P/P4PP1/RBB1R1K1 w >>>Another GM sac refuted by computers? >>> >>>This position is from... >>> >>>GM Fischer - GM Leonid Stein >>>Interzonal, Sousse 1967 >>> >>>GM Fischer played the (so called) winning move Bxf5! Annotators claim GM Fischer >>>wins easily after Bxf5! gxf5 Qg3+ Kh7 Ng5+ Bxg5 Bxg5 Qe8(or Qd3). >>> >>>For this reason GM Stein played Qf8? and lost...but Bxf5 gxf5! seems to more >>>then hold the position. Do any computers or humans disagree. >> >>Yes, Hiarcs 9 and Drexel 0.815. >> >>1. Bxf5 gxf5 2. Qg3+ Kh7 3. Ng5+ Bxg5 4. Bxg5 Ra3 5. Qf4 Qf8 (5... Qe8 6. Qxf5+ >>Qg6 7. Qxc5 Rg8 8. h4) 6. e7 Qf7 7. e8=Q Rxe8 8. Rxe8 Qxe8 9. Qxf5+ * >> >>I would always prefer to play this with white. >>Show me how to win with black with only the h-pawn to be left. >> >>True, Bxf5 doesn´t win easily. >> >>Btw, even dubious moves are sometimes the "best" moves. >>After all Tal won a lot of games with rather unsound attacks. >> >>Michael >> >>> >>>Example line. >>>Bxf5 gxf5! Qg3+ Kh7 Ng5+ Bxg5 Bxg5 Ra3!. > >Very true; but "dubious moves" do not make good test moves...IHMO > >...Bxf5 looks like he goofed here...:-) No, he didn´t. White has a draw after Bxf5. 1.Ng5 is worse. Michael >Rob
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.