Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 19:20:48 08/01/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 01, 2004 at 21:17:36, Albert Silver wrote:
>On August 01, 2004 at 20:57:02, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>
>>Strong game by Pro Deo 1.0 vs. Fritz 8 !!
>>
>>First a analysis:
>>
>>Petrovich/GMKiriakov - Katapultov/S8
>>
>>[D]8/4k3/2p5/1p1p1p2/1P1P1Pp1/4Pr2/4R1KP/8 w - - 0 1
>>
>>Endposition, game is draw.
>>
>>Analysis by Fritz 8:
>>
>>57.Te1 Th3 58.Kh1 Kd6 59.Kg2 Kd7 60.Kh1 Kc7 61.Kg2 Kd8
>> µ (-0.82) Tiefe: 14/22 00:00:08 1652kN
>>57.Te1 Th3 58.Kh1 Kd6 59.Kg2 Kd7 60.Kh1 Kc7 61.Kg2 Kc8 62.Tc1
>> µ (-0.82) Tiefe: 15/25 00:00:14 2907kN
>>57.Te1 Th3 58.Kh1 Kd6 59.Kg2 Kd7 60.Kh1 Kc7 61.Kg2 Kc8 62.Tc1
>> µ (-0.82) Tiefe: 16/29 00:00:25 5589kN
>>
>>Analysis by Shredder 7.04:
>>
>>57.Te1 Th3 58.Te2 Kd6 59.Kf1 Th8 60.Ke1 Ta8 61.Kd2 Ta3 62.Kc2 Ke7 63.Kb2
>> µ (-0.95) Tiefe: 16/28 00:00:12 1691kN
>>57.Te1 Th3 58.Te2 Kd6 59.Kf1 Th8 60.Ke1 Ta8 61.Kd2 Ta3 62.Kc2 Kc7
>> µ (-0.94) Tiefe: 17/31 00:00:18 2721kN
>>
>>Analysis by Pro Deo 1.0 (hash 24 MB Wb-->UCI Engine, style Rebel 3):
>>
>>57.Te1 Kd6 58.Kg1 Th3 59.Te2 Ke7 60.Kg2 Kd7 61.Kg1 Kd6 62.Kg2 Kd7 63.Kg1
>> ³ (-0.33) Tiefe: 15 00:00:11 3235kN
>>57.Te1 Kd6 58.Kg1 Th3 59.Te2 Kd7 60.Kg2 Ke6 61.Tc2 Kd6 62.Tc3 Th4 63.Ta3 Th3
>>64.Tc3 Th4 65.Ta3 Th3
>> ³ (-0.32) Tiefe: 16 00:00:20 6132kN
>>
>>(Nemeth, Privat 02.08.2004)
>>
>>At time I played a first game with Pro Deo 1.0 vs. Fritz 8.0026, Nunn2 first
>>variation.
>>
>>GUI=Chessprogram8
>>Hardware=P3 600
>>Timecontrol=30min.
>>Hash: Pro Deo (Style Rebel 2) 1.0 as UCI 24MB, Fritz 8 32MB
>>EGTB=OFF
>>PB=OFF
>>
>>[Event "P600, Blitz:30'"]
>>[Site "P3 600"]
>>[Date "2004.08.02"]
>>[Round "1"]
>>[White "Pro Deo 1.0"]
>>[Black "Fritz 8.0026"]
>>[Result "1-0"]
>>[ECO "A30"]
>>[Annotator "0.28;-0.09"]
>>[PlyCount "67"]
>>
>>{W=11.0 ply; 191kN/s B=11.4 ply; 326kN/s} 1. c4 c5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Nc3 e6 4. g3
>>b6 5. Bg2 Bb7 6. O-O Be7 7. d4 cxd4 8. Qxd4 d6 9. Rd1 a6 10. b3 Nbd7 11. e4 {
>>Beide letzter Buchzug} O-O {-0.09/12 76} 12. Ba3 {0.28/12 62} Nc5 {-0.03/12 67}
>>13. e5 {0.28/11 31} dxe5 {0.03/11 34} 14. Qxe5 {(Dxd8) 0.23/10 23} Qc8 {
>>-0.03/11 63} 15. Qf4 {(Lb2) 0.26/10 37} Bc6 {(Td8) 0.07/10 39} 16. b4 {
>>(Lb2) 0.32/10 49} Nb7 {-0.06/10 32} 17. b5 {(Se2) 0.33/10 48} Bxa3 {0.00/12 69}
>>18. bxc6 {0.04/10 10} Qxc6 {0.10/12 62} 19. Ng5 {0.48/11 36} Qc8 {0.07/11 30}
>>20. Na4 {0.25/10 28} Bc5 {(Tb8) 0.10/11 37} 21. Rab1 {0.48/11 47} e5 {
>>0.19/11 32} 22. Qf3 {0.58/11 30} Ra7 {0.25/11 29} 23. Nxb6 {0.46/10 24} Bxb6 {
>>(Dc7) 0.47/12 66} 24. Rxb6 {0.73/8 4} Nc5 {(h6) 0.47/11 30} 25. Rxf6 {
>>1.53/10 26} gxf6 {0.75/11 20} 26. Qxf6 {1.53/9 11} Qg4 {(Tc7) 1.28/10 29} 27.
>>Bf3 {1.46/11 44} Qc8 {2.85/10 22} 28. Rd6 {3.57/10 46} e4 {(a5) 3.35/9 22} 29.
>>Nxh7 {4.79/11 41} Ne6 {5.50/11 30} 30. Bg4 {(Lxe4) 5.90/11 41} Rb7 {
>>(e3) 5.25/10 33} 31. Bxe6 {7.67/11 39} fxe6 {7.66/11 22} 32. Nxf8 {7.93/11 23}
>>Qxf8 {(e3) 8.03/11 53} 33. Qxe6+ {(Td8) 9.02/12 105} Rf7 {9.00/11 30} 34. Rd7 {
>>(Tc6) 10.61/11 20} 1-0
>>
>>Strong played by Pro Deo 1.0.
>>
>>Eduard
>>
>>PS: German: Wir haben nun 2700 Computer Elo umsonst. Cool !!
>
>
>I saw that for each of the analyses, you used a different Rebel style. What are
>they exactly. I saw them in the configuration pane, but didn't know what were
>Rebel 1, 2, 3, or plain Rebel.
>
> Albert
Hi!
I do not know this! I hope that a Tester can us say waht is Style 1-3?
I analyses only the position Kiriakov vs. S8 with the Styles. Thats all.
In Style 1, Pro Deo an another move played as petrovich, in Style 3 then exactly
Re1.
In the game I used Style 2 then. That is all from me.
I hope that Ed will give us an anser.
Best,
Eduard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.