Author: Lanny DiBartolomeo
Date: 15:43:26 12/31/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 31, 1998 at 14:28:03, Marc van Hal wrote: >Come on guys be serious to a normal question I agree on Komputerkorners answer >though but it is strange that Chessmaster 6000 by the games I did see are not as >good as the games from Chessmaster5500 >But I did buy this program only for the nice pieces and to see what the tutirals >brought but if you go to Gambitsoft.com you see that Chessmaster is rated as >master not Grand master and comparing it to the other programs in the Master >line it is not so bad though it did lose more games from ChesssystemTal then >Chessmaster5500 did but the program only can be improved when a 64bits engine >will come out I gues if Johan is reading this he agrees Hello, seriously cm6000 is (in my humble opinion) much improved strength wise over cm5000 which is of course the same engine in 5500 .I have played both and yes I am strong enough to feel the difference and im sure most here are. It is also on GM list now and the strength of CM6000 was really never a question only some missing features which if you followed the thread the features are good enough to get you to master class and when your at master class believe me you still have a ways to go to be at its strength, and i mean this at standard tournament time controls.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.