Author: Georg Langrath
Date: 16:06:07 12/31/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 30, 1998 at 14:18:51, rich wrote: >I expected cm 6000 to act in a serious and proffessional way. >Sadly, it is still a programme for little children.(compare with fritz and >rebel).CM6000 has an inadequate opening book, there are bugs everywhere, and the >tutorials are only for beginners.Also CMlive(mplayer.com)is so slow and >frustrating that I deleted it after trying once. >The only thing I like are Waitszszszszkins annotated games. >Also analyzing a game with cm 6000 is hopeless. >Has anyone noticed that CM sometimes starts to think when it still is in the >book ? ( for example after e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cd Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3) >I'm very disappointed at CM 6000. Does anyone feel the same way ? >It seems that mindscape has a lot to learn. I agrre that CM 6000 has all the advantages you name, and more to them. What I don´t understand is one thing. I love it. Why?? Georg
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.