Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Shredder didn´t participate on the next worldchampionchip

Author: Gerd Isenberg

Date: 08:14:11 08/02/04

Go up one level in this thread


On August 02, 2004 at 11:00:01, Albert Silver wrote:

>On August 02, 2004 at 10:34:23, Gerd Isenberg wrote:
>
>>On August 02, 2004 at 10:03:23, Thomas Lagershausen wrote:
>>
>>>In a match of the best programs against three of the best players of the world
>>>Shredder did not participate in this interesting challenge.It is obviosly the
>>>same old story of money.
>>>
>>>What a pitty, the best program of the world would fit in the team best of
>>>computers.
>>>
>>>Please see
>>>www.ajedrezbilbao.com
>>>
>>>TL
>>
>>Thanks for the news, Thomas ;-)
>>
>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?379472
>>http://chessbase.com/espanola/newsdetail2.asp?id=3048
>>http://www.ajedrezbilbao.com/FestivalEN.htm
>>
>>Junior is current world champion!
>>Fritz as synonym for a computer chess program has a wildcard ;-)
>>Isn't there a playoff between Hydra and Shredder?
>>
>>Gerd
>
>
>I don't agree. Of the 6 participants, Junior is the only one that makes clear
>sense as it is the reigning World Champion. However, Hydra has won one
>tournament, and isn't even doing that amazingly on the Playchess server, if
>that's a reference. And much as I admire Fritz, it loses to Shredder in both the
>SSDF rating lists and the WC titles. The human players are the same. I have the
>utmost respect for them, and look forward to the games, but to claim they are
>the absolute best humanity has to offer is ridiculous, barring Topalov, but
>especially Karjakin. Either they should be the best human players period, or the
>best players against computers. Still, what is meant is that without clearer
>reasons for the players selected, or some form of qualifying process, it is
>impossible to claim a World Championship in which *many* other candidates could
>easily come ahead if they were allowed a chance to participate. It is a purely
>invitational event with a fancy but meaningless title.
>
>                                       Albert


Yes, i was a bit ironic about the event.

I wonder whether there is still no comment or confirmation on chessbase.com or
icga-site. I mean a Human verus Computer World Championship (what discipline?)
is a rather strong title for some "arbitrary" choosen players and programs.
Specially if supported by the ICGA.

Gerd



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.