Author: Uri Blass
Date: 13:12:46 08/02/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 02, 2004 at 16:04:14, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On August 02, 2004 at 16:01:14, Cesar Contreras wrote: > >>Hi >> >>I'm getting better result's (about 8% margin) ordering capture moves based only >>on victim value (ignoring attacker value), i think i'm doing something grong. >> >>My question is: it's significatly better MVV\LVA over MVV >> >>I know both are aproximations, but witch one it's statically better. >> >>Thanks in advance. > >Did you use attacker values instead of attacker *indexes*? > >It's a common mistake and I can't think of anything else that would cause what >you're seeing. > >-- >GCP I am afraid that I have no attacker indexes in my code so I do not understand what you are talking about. I have piece list but it is only an array like bishops[10][2] that gives me the squares of the bishops in the board(no more than 10 bishops per side). Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.