Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 13:22:14 08/02/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 02, 2004 at 16:12:46, Uri Blass wrote:
>On August 02, 2004 at 16:04:14, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
>
>>On August 02, 2004 at 16:01:14, Cesar Contreras wrote:
>>
>>>Hi
>>>
>>>I'm getting better result's (about 8% margin) ordering capture moves based only
>>>on victim value (ignoring attacker value), i think i'm doing something grong.
>>>
>>>My question is: it's significatly better MVV\LVA over MVV
>>>
>>>I know both are aproximations, but witch one it's statically better.
>>>
>>>Thanks in advance.
>>
>>Did you use attacker values instead of attacker *indexes*?
>>
>>It's a common mistake and I can't think of anything else that would cause what
>>you're seeing.
>>
>>--
>>GCP
>
>I am afraid that I have no attacker indexes in my code so I do not understand
>what you are talking about.
>
>I have piece list but it is only an array like bishops[10][2] that gives me the
>squares of the bishops in the board(no more than 10 bishops per side).
MVV/LVA value MVV/LVA index
Pawn 100 1
Bishop 300 2
Knight 300 2
Rook 500 3
Queen 900 4
Sortvalue = Victimvalue - Attackerindex
--
GCP
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.