Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Advantage of MVV\LVA over MVV

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 13:23:32 08/02/04

Go up one level in this thread


On August 02, 2004 at 16:21:22, Cesar Contreras wrote:

>>
>>Did you use attacker values instead of attacker *indexes*?
>>
>
>Thanks for your replay.
>Yes, i use attacker values, is it wrong?.
>
>For MVV\LVA i do:
>value_capture=(piece_value[victim_piece_type]-piece_value[attacker_piece_type]);
>
>And for MVV i only do:
>value_capture=piece_value[victim_piece_type];
>
>i use dose values to order captures.
>piece_value it's an array with the values of every kind of piece.

See my reply to Uri. What is captured is more important than what
you capture with (because 99% of the positions you search are pure
nonsense where it is not possible to recapture).

--
GCP



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.