Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Advantage of MVV\LVA over MVV (TRICK OPINION AND SQUARE TABLES)

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 13:46:23 08/02/04

Go up one level in this thread

On August 02, 2004 at 16:44:36, Cesar Contreras wrote:

>
>Is supose changing:
>
>value_capture=(piece_value[victim_piece_type]-piece_value[attacker_piece_type]);
>
>To
>
>value_capture=(piece_value[victim_piece_type]-piece_value[attacker_piece_type]/10);
>
>will do the trick. Supossing PAWN_VALUE = 100
>I'm doing this, because i need bigger diferences between capture values because
>i use piece square table as a (small )factor to order captures. Is it wrong to
>use piece square tables on ordering captures?

Sounds like a very good idea to me. Capturing a well placed piece with
a badly placed one should on average be better than the reverse.

--
GCP

• Re: Advantage of MVV\LVA over MVV (TRICK OPINION AND SQUARE TABLES) Scott Gasch 21:56:48 08/02/04
  • Re: Advantage of MVV\LVA over MVV (TRICK OPINION AND SQUARE TABLES) Aivaras Juzvikas 01:39:38 08/03/04

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.