Author: John Merlino
Date: 18:21:58 08/02/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 02, 2004 at 21:18:54, Joel Martus wrote: >On August 02, 2004 at 20:45:30, John Merlino wrote: > >>On August 02, 2004 at 20:08:33, Joel Martus wrote: >> >>> this really bothers me and i cant figure it out i'm not even sure which is >>>better overall this is from a test postion you tested earlier tested Pro Deo in >>>lokasoft and RebelUCI in Arena >>>r4k1r/pbqn1pb1/1p2p3/6B1/3p2Q1/3B1N2/PPP2PP1/3RR1K1 w >>> >>>Pro Deo 1.0 >>>00:00:00.5 0.43 1 4 Nxd4 >>>00:00:00.5 1.09 1 69 Qf4 >>>00:00:00.5 0.38 2 227 Qf4 Qxf4 Bxf4 >>>00:00:00.5 0.57 2 576 Bh4 Ne5 Nxe5 Bxe5 >>>00:00:00.5 0.56 3 1929 Bh4 f5 Qg5 Bxf3 >>>00:00:00.5 0.65 4 7689 Bh4 Ne5 Nxe5 Bxe5 Bb5 >>>00:00:00.7 0.25 5 23024 Bh4 Ne5 Nxe5 Bxe5 Be4 f5 >>>00:00:01.5 0.21 6 136201 Bh4 Ne5 Nxe5 Bxe5 Kf1 Rg8 Bg5 >>>00:00:01.7 0.21 6 173449 Bf4 >>>00:00:01.8 0.35 6 184039 Bf4 e5 Bh2 Qd6 Be4 Bd5 >>>00:00:03.3 0.42 7 385740 Bf4 e5 Bh2 Bxf3 Qxf3 Rc8 Ba6 Re8 >>>00:00:04.7 0.44 7 607874 Be4 Bxe4 Qxe4 Re8 Bh4 f5 Qe2 >>>00:00:10.1 0.60 8 1426630 Be4 Rc8 Nxd4 Bxd4 >>>00:00:22.7 0.57 9 3460229 Be4 Bxe4 Qxe4 Re8 Bf4 Qc4 Bd6+ Kg8 Nxd4 Qxa2 >>>00:00:43.1 0.57 9 6968615 Rxe6 >>>00:00:54.9 1.51 9 8898064 Rxe6 fxe6 Be7+ Kxe7 Qxg7+ Kd6 Qg3+ e5 Nxd4 Rag8 Nb5+ >>>Ke7 Nxc7 Rxg3 fxg3 Rg8 >>> >>> >>>Rebeluci UCI1 2 MB: >>> 1 00:00 0.43 Nf3xd4 >>> 1 00:00 1.09 Qg4f4 >>> 2 00:00 0.38 Qg4f4 Qc7xf4 Bg5xf4 >>> 2 00:00 0.57 Bg5h4 Nd7e5 Nf3xe5 Bg7xe5 >>> 3 00:00 0.56 Bg5h4 f7f5 Qg4g5 Bb7xf3 >>> 4 00:00 0.65 Bg5h4 Nd7e5 Nf3xe5 Bg7xe5 Bd3b5 >>> 5 00:00 0.25 Bg5h4 Nd7e5 Nf3xe5 Bg7xe5 Bd3e4 f7f5 >>> 6 00:00 0.21 Bg5h4 Nd7e5 Nf3xe5 Bg7xe5 Kg1f1 Rh8g8 Bh4g5 >>> 6 00:01 0.21 Bg5f4 >>> 6 00:01 0.35 Bg5f4 e6e5 Bf4h2 Qc7d6 Bd3e4 Bb7d5 >>> 7 00:02 0.42 Bg5f4 e6e5 Bf4h2 Bb7xf3 Qg4xf3 Ra8c8 Bd3a6 Rc8e8 >>> 7 00:04 0.44 Bd3e4 Bb7xe4 Qg4xe4 Ra8e8 Bg5h4 f7f5 Qe4e2 >>> 8 00:09 0.60 Bd3e4 Ra8c8 Nf3xd4 >>> 9 00:21 0.61 Bd3e4 Bb7xe4 Qg4xe4 Ra8c8 Nf3xd4 Qc7h2+ >>> 9 00:38 0.61 Re1xe6 >>> 9 00:47 1.28 Re1xe6 f7xe6 Bg5e7+ Kf8xe7 Qg4xg7+ Ke7d6 Qg7g3+ e6e5 Nf3xd4 >>>Ra8g8 >>>All setting were using default settings >> >>Not sure what the problem is, other than the speed difference. Is that what >>you're talking about? >> >>It's about 10% faster in the 2nd version, which could easily be attributed to a >>different GUI. >> >>jm > >Well the scores are different for one thing Duh. Ok, I missed that. Interesting that the PVs are almost entirely identical, though. Perhaps the "default" settings are different for UCI than for WB? Just guessing.... jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.