Author: Albert Silver
Date: 19:49:27 08/02/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 02, 2004 at 21:21:58, John Merlino wrote:
>On August 02, 2004 at 21:18:54, Joel Martus wrote:
>
>>On August 02, 2004 at 20:45:30, John Merlino wrote:
>>
>>>On August 02, 2004 at 20:08:33, Joel Martus wrote:
>>>
>>>> this really bothers me and i cant figure it out i'm not even sure which is
>>>>better overall this is from a test postion you tested earlier tested Pro Deo in
>>>>lokasoft and RebelUCI in Arena
>>>>r4k1r/pbqn1pb1/1p2p3/6B1/3p2Q1/3B1N2/PPP2PP1/3RR1K1 w
>>>>
>>>>Pro Deo 1.0
>>>>00:00:00.5 0.43 1 4 Nxd4
>>>>00:00:00.5 1.09 1 69 Qf4
>>>>00:00:00.5 0.38 2 227 Qf4 Qxf4 Bxf4
>>>>00:00:00.5 0.57 2 576 Bh4 Ne5 Nxe5 Bxe5
>>>>00:00:00.5 0.56 3 1929 Bh4 f5 Qg5 Bxf3
>>>>00:00:00.5 0.65 4 7689 Bh4 Ne5 Nxe5 Bxe5 Bb5
>>>>00:00:00.7 0.25 5 23024 Bh4 Ne5 Nxe5 Bxe5 Be4 f5
>>>>00:00:01.5 0.21 6 136201 Bh4 Ne5 Nxe5 Bxe5 Kf1 Rg8 Bg5
>>>>00:00:01.7 0.21 6 173449 Bf4
>>>>00:00:01.8 0.35 6 184039 Bf4 e5 Bh2 Qd6 Be4 Bd5
>>>>00:00:03.3 0.42 7 385740 Bf4 e5 Bh2 Bxf3 Qxf3 Rc8 Ba6 Re8
>>>>00:00:04.7 0.44 7 607874 Be4 Bxe4 Qxe4 Re8 Bh4 f5 Qe2
>>>>00:00:10.1 0.60 8 1426630 Be4 Rc8 Nxd4 Bxd4
>>>>00:00:22.7 0.57 9 3460229 Be4 Bxe4 Qxe4 Re8 Bf4 Qc4 Bd6+ Kg8 Nxd4 Qxa2
>>>>00:00:43.1 0.57 9 6968615 Rxe6
>>>>00:00:54.9 1.51 9 8898064 Rxe6 fxe6 Be7+ Kxe7 Qxg7+ Kd6 Qg3+ e5 Nxd4 Rag8 Nb5+
>>>>Ke7 Nxc7 Rxg3 fxg3 Rg8
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Rebeluci UCI1 2 MB:
>>>> 1 00:00 0.43 Nf3xd4
>>>> 1 00:00 1.09 Qg4f4
>>>> 2 00:00 0.38 Qg4f4 Qc7xf4 Bg5xf4
>>>> 2 00:00 0.57 Bg5h4 Nd7e5 Nf3xe5 Bg7xe5
>>>> 3 00:00 0.56 Bg5h4 f7f5 Qg4g5 Bb7xf3
>>>> 4 00:00 0.65 Bg5h4 Nd7e5 Nf3xe5 Bg7xe5 Bd3b5
>>>> 5 00:00 0.25 Bg5h4 Nd7e5 Nf3xe5 Bg7xe5 Bd3e4 f7f5
>>>> 6 00:00 0.21 Bg5h4 Nd7e5 Nf3xe5 Bg7xe5 Kg1f1 Rh8g8 Bh4g5
>>>> 6 00:01 0.21 Bg5f4
>>>> 6 00:01 0.35 Bg5f4 e6e5 Bf4h2 Qc7d6 Bd3e4 Bb7d5
>>>> 7 00:02 0.42 Bg5f4 e6e5 Bf4h2 Bb7xf3 Qg4xf3 Ra8c8 Bd3a6 Rc8e8
>>>> 7 00:04 0.44 Bd3e4 Bb7xe4 Qg4xe4 Ra8e8 Bg5h4 f7f5 Qe4e2
>>>> 8 00:09 0.60 Bd3e4 Ra8c8 Nf3xd4
>>>> 9 00:21 0.61 Bd3e4 Bb7xe4 Qg4xe4 Ra8c8 Nf3xd4 Qc7h2+
>>>> 9 00:38 0.61 Re1xe6
>>>> 9 00:47 1.28 Re1xe6 f7xe6 Bg5e7+ Kf8xe7 Qg4xg7+ Ke7d6 Qg7g3+ e6e5 Nf3xd4
>>>>Ra8g8
>>>>All setting were using default settings
>>>
>>>Not sure what the problem is, other than the speed difference. Is that what
>>>you're talking about?
>>>
>>>It's about 10% faster in the 2nd version, which could easily be attributed to a
>>>different GUI.
>>>
>>>jm
>>
>>Well the scores are different for one thing
>
>Duh. Ok, I missed that. Interesting that the PVs are almost entirely identical,
>though. Perhaps the "default" settings are different for UCI than for WB? Just
>guessing....
>
>jm
Only the last 3 lines are different in the scores. All the rest are identical.
I'd just run it again, and be sure they are both using the same amount of hash.
Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.