Author: Mark Young
Date: 00:46:17 08/03/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 03, 2004 at 02:47:22, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>On August 02, 2004 at 17:47:11, Mark Young wrote:
>
>>On August 02, 2004 at 17:36:44, Norm Pollock wrote:
>>
>>>On August 02, 2004 at 17:35:18, Norm Pollock wrote:
>>>
>>>>I live rodeo2 over rodeo. It does better against Fritz8. But maybe another style
>>>>is best? Any help?
>>>
>>>I meant to say: I like rebel2 over rebel. Sorry.
>>
>>Pro Deo 1.0 just came out. How can you say Rebel2 is better then Rebel playing
>>Fritz 8. How did you test this... :)
>
> Right; Pro Deo 1.0 just came out. And we need some weeks
> and thousands of games to say something concrete. Any
> conclusion on the basis of some test positions and some
> dozens blitz games is worthless for me.
> Kurt [http://www.utzingerk.com]
We do need time and many games to know for certain anything about Pro Deo 1.0.
Blitz games are worthless to me also. I want to know how the program will do at
slower time controls.
Here are my results so far with Pro Deo 1.0.
CPU P4 2.53
TC 60/30
Hash Tables 400 MB
Book 4GB opening book. Each program plays with their own copy.
5 man TB (Pro Deo 1.0 has no TB access)
Shredder 8 playing with MK setting.
As expected(rebel 12 ssdf rating +30 points)Pro Deo 1.0 is in last place at this
time.
From Pro Deo web page.
"PRO DEO 1.0 (estimasted 20-30 elo stronger than the last Rebel (version
12.00.01)"
Mark 2004
1 2 3 4
1 Shredder 8 2500 +136 ********** 0½ ½11 ½11
5.5/8
2 Shredder 7.04 2500 +88 1½ ********** 10½ ½1½
5.0/8
3 Deep Fritz 8 2500 -88 ½00 01½ ********** 01
3.0/8
4 Pro Deo 1.0 2500 -136 ½00 ½0½ 10 **********
2.5/8
Average elo: 2500 <=> Category: 10
gm = 20.10 m = 14.10
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.