Author: morphy
Date: 03:08:16 08/03/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 03, 2004 at 05:48:15, Gerd Isenberg wrote: >On August 03, 2004 at 04:54:11, morphy wrote: > >>Why the valutation is always referred to the material advantage (where a pawn in >>more is the unit) and we can't have a valutation in tems of percentage of >>probability for winning and drawing? > >Maybe you find some answers at R. Scharnagl's SMIRF sites: > >http://www.chessbox.de/Compu/schachwert1_e.html >and following. Thank you very much, I'm analyzing the site... I don't understand the Reply by Uri Blass, I'm not an expert programmer but i want begin to understand some principles and I asked some doubt to you.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.